But, but, but there are 52 players on a rooster.
Is that not too many wives?
Do you "swing" both ways? - LOL
Your post losses a lot of its presumed meaning when it is translated into English. - LOL
Lol. Hmmm.
But, but, but there are 52 players on a rooster.
Is that not too many wives?
Do you "swing" both ways? - LOL
Your post losses a lot of its presumed meaning when it is translated into English. - LOL
"52 players on a rooster"?But, but, but there are 52 players on a rooster.
Is that not too many wives?
Do you "swing" both ways? - LOL
Your post losses a lot of its presumed meaning when it is translated into English. - LOL
Not at all. The off season can be even more interesting than the regular season, as the league traffics in hope that your team could just be a player or two away from relevance. Parity is the name of the game for all 32 teams in all 32 markets, and free agency is key to that.Not sure how to answer this question.
For the players it's probably a great thing.
Hah.,... The Universities are mercenaries at the academic level all on their own.If your a great coach at developing talent and a great GM at drafting talent it certainly has hurt your program. If your on the opposite side of the equation it works the opposite and allows those clubs to buy some wins. As far as the players it's a finacial windfall. It's definitely made the NFL game much more mercenary and has now bled over to the universities and colleges where our wealthiest Americans boosters are now buying wins for their college programs instead of investing that wealth into education of the youth of our nation. Not a good look for the USA imo.
Agree with this, and I don't always side with the players.
It is an infringement on individual rights, as opposed to a player holding out while he is under contract.
That is a valid point.
On the other hand, while technically players do not have to join the NFLPA, that is not a realistic option in practice.
That is definitely part of the issue I never see discussed in our media our universities and colleges handing out a sub par product on which they are paid up front by both students and student loans and are held to no accountability on the back end. Instead our media paints a picture that both those providing the loans and the rich US taxpayers should be held accountable for the students indebtedness. The college gets all the money up front first, the student who made the decision to financially give that money to that institution hopefully for "their" own education are second in line and third those institutions and taxpayers assisting in the process third. It's completely backwards on accountability on the back end. Completely backwards. The NFL should be the ones financially supporting their college football farm leagues which is what our clege football programs have become.Hah.,... The Universities are mercenaries at the academic level all on their own.
They should be required to pay back student loans for taking the money and enrolling kids that they were aware were unqualified. I understand everyone deserves a chance, but many were done a total disservice and the US taxpayer were left with the tab, while the enrollment offices didn't give two ***** about whether those kids were likely to, or put in a position to succeed.
The daily fantasy football crap is what made the NFL’s popularity explode, if you ask me. Or fantasy football, in general.Ya and gambling is an epidemic.
Most people can do it responsibly but those that can’t have ruined their lives and in many cases, their families.
As someone who likes going to casinos and loves playing poker, if both disappeared magically I wouldn’t care.
Also, the “daily fantasy football” crap wasn’t a good thing.
The diva entitled QBs have, started with Brady. Basically can't hit a QB without their consent now.
The daily fantasy football crap is what made the NFL’s popularity explode, if you ask me. Or fantasy football, in general.
"52 players on a rooster"?
This from a man who made light of "four fathers"?