He helps immediately because he can play with the vet Qbs on the team. He doesn't help a young tannehill reach his potential. thus immediate help vs long term help.We don't need to build a team of choir boys, we need to build a team of playmakers and talented football players. Marshall isn't a model citizen, but he certainly isn't a head case on the level of T.O. He never pulled anything close to the **** that T.O. used to in SF or Philly. Marshall's "antics" are being severly overblown by people on this board that are simply using tactics of revisionist history to justify a bad trade.
I'm not really sure I understand what point you are trying to make either when you say "all he does is help us immediately". First of all he's still in his prime so it's not like he couldn't help us beyond "immediately", secondly is it somehow a bad thing that he makes us a much better team this season? I don't think that we were really a "win now" team with Marshall anyway, but I'd definitely have a lot more faith in this team if we had a real shot to score some points to go along with a pretty good defense.
I'm just saying, I hope I'm wrong but I think our offense is going to be a **** show this year. Marshall was not only a big time playmaker but he also opened up our running game because defenses had to respect Marshall on the outside. Now that our primary offensive threat is Bush, teams are going to put 8 in the box and take away the run. We won't be able to pass either because we have an extremely mediocre receiving corps and a very average QB. I just have no faith in our ability to score points this year, and I think Marshall would make that big of a difference. He would have opened up so much for everybody else.
btw you're right, he doesn't have To's antics on the field, he has worse antics off the field.