Dynasties... How many were there? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Dynasties... How many were there?

FINintheMOON

FINintheMOON

Practice Squad
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
4,898
Reaction score
0
Location
Catharpin, Va
Since the merger of the AFL and NFL, how many teams went to more than 3 superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?

How many teams went to 3 or more consecutive superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
 
FINintheMOON said:
Since the merger of the AFL and NFL, how many teams went to more than 3 superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?

How many teams went to 3 or more consecutive superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
Click to expand...

since 1970, these teams have gone to more than three SB in a 10 year span since merger (6)

Dallas, 1970-1978 (70,71,75,77,78)
Pittsburgh, 1974-1979 (74,75,78,79)
Washington 1982-1991 (82,83,87,91)
San Francisco 1981-1989 (81,84,88,89)
Buffalo 1990-1993 (90,91,92,93)
New England 1996-2004 (96,01,03,04)

I think that`s all of them. I wouldn`t consider Buffalo a dinasty (no titles) but you just said teams that WENT to the SB. the 90`s cowboys are considered a dinasty, but they only went to three SBs

as for the second question, only two teams have gone to three or more straight SBs and those are Miami, 1971-1973 and Buffalo, 1990-1993.
 
Phin19 said:
since 1970, these teams have gone to more than three SB in a 10 year span since merger (6)

Dallas, 1970-1978 (70,71,75,77,78)
Pittsburgh, 1974-1979 (74,75,78,79)
Washington 1982-1991 (82,83,87,91)
San Francisco 1981-1989 (81,84,88,89)
Buffalo 1990-1993 (90,91,92,93)
New England 1996-2004 (96,01,03,04)

I think that`s all of them. I wouldn`t consider Buffalo a dinasty (no titles) but you just said teams that WENT to the SB. the 90`s cowboys are considered a dinasty, but they only went to three SBs

as for the second question, only two teams have gone to three or more straight SBs and those are Miami, 1971-1973 and Buffalo, 1990-1993.
Click to expand...



id say youve got it covered there for sure.
 
how is buffalo not a dynasty? no other team has done (or in all liklihood will do) what they did.
 
Phin19 said:
since 1970, these teams have gone to more than three SB in a 10 year span since merger (6)

Dallas, 1970-1978 (70,71,75,77,78)
Pittsburgh, 1974-1979 (74,75,78,79)
Washington 1982-1991 (82,83,87,91)
San Francisco 1981-1989 (81,84,88,89)
Buffalo 1990-1993 (90,91,92,93)
New England 1996-2004 (96,01,03,04)
Click to expand...

I find it odd that you consider the Pats 10 year dynasty from 96-04 instead of 01-07.
 
The Vikings went to four Super Bowls in the 70s.

69-70 vs. KC (Super Bowl IV)
73-74 vs. MIA (Super Bowl VIII)
74-75 vs. PIT (Super Bowl IX)
76-77 vs. OAK (Super Bowl XI)
 
FINintheMOON said:
Since the merger of the AFL and NFL, how many teams went to more than 3 superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?

How many teams went to 3 or more consecutive superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
Click to expand...

Going to 3 SBs in a 10 year span is not a dynasty.
 
TheDon74 said:
I find it odd that you consider the Pats 10 year dynasty from 96-04 instead of 01-07.
Click to expand...

lol I posted that in january 2006, But you're right 01-07 makes a lot more sense today.
 
FINintheMOON said:
Since the merger of the AFL and NFL, how many teams went to more than 3 superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?

How many teams went to 3 or more consecutive superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
Click to expand...
Don't see anyone mentioning the Dolphins.
72, lost to Dallas
73, beat the Vikings
74, beat the Redskins
 
Kadiddlehopper said:
Don't see anyone mentioning the Dolphins.
72, lost to Dallas
73, beat the Vikings
74, beat the Redskins
Click to expand...

71, lost to Dallas
72, beat the Redskins
73, beat the Vikings

Well essentially you've got the years right since the Super Bowl is played at the beginning of the new year, but we played the Redskins in Super Bowl VII and the Vikings in VIII.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom