BLITZKRIEG
~LACUNA LEGIONS~
Why shouldn't OLB E. Moore replace OLB M. Greenwood if he's capable????
I think that's the most important question here.....
Being that 2002 was M. Greenwood's first season, and he was our starter at OLB, I have this question.....
Whose to say that OLB E. Moore can't come in and do the same this year????....Or even better???
How much of a drop-off are we actually looking at here if we decide to go with OLB E. Moore????...
IMO not much, if any. Are we that desperate for M. Greenwood to remain the starter at OLB in 2003???.....I don't think so.
I think they should let whoever looks the best during Training Camp be the starter in 2003. M. Greenwood was not a very visible addition last year, so I don't think putting E. Moore out there in place of him is going to hurt us. It could actually help!!!!.....
Adding OLB E. Moore will certainly push M. Greenwood harder than ever, and he {E. Moore} could also prove to be the better OLB once Training Camp is over......
PHINZ RULE!!!!:cap:
I think that's the most important question here.....
Being that 2002 was M. Greenwood's first season, and he was our starter at OLB, I have this question.....
Whose to say that OLB E. Moore can't come in and do the same this year????....Or even better???
How much of a drop-off are we actually looking at here if we decide to go with OLB E. Moore????...
IMO not much, if any. Are we that desperate for M. Greenwood to remain the starter at OLB in 2003???.....I don't think so.
I think they should let whoever looks the best during Training Camp be the starter in 2003. M. Greenwood was not a very visible addition last year, so I don't think putting E. Moore out there in place of him is going to hurt us. It could actually help!!!!.....
Adding OLB E. Moore will certainly push M. Greenwood harder than ever, and he {E. Moore} could also prove to be the better OLB once Training Camp is over......
PHINZ RULE!!!!:cap: