mag1carl
Practice Squad
Rickt never got us to the play offs. It takes a whole team
Edwards, Minnesota, and Trades.......
- Thread starter Butterfrog 2.0
- Start date
djfresh47
R.I.P. djfresh47
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2004
- Messages
- 4,858
- Reaction score
- 0
KB21 said:
I get your arguement, but SD with Tomlinson was awful before Brees had a good season. My agruement against taking Edwards is, what good is a WR if there isn't a QB who can get them the ball? I think Mike Williams is a better player than Edwards, and the thing going against Williams is his '40 time, but Edwards does not play as fast as his '40 time suggest. Williams in 2 seasons had 9 less TD receptions than Edwards. People can sugges it was because he had Palmer/Leinhart both had their breakout season with Williams at WR, and Edwards played most of his career with a very good college Qb in John Navarre.
How in God's name does Ricky friggin Williams get included in a conversation about possible trades tomorrow???
:shakeno::shakeno::shakeno:
:shakeno::shakeno::shakeno:
KB21 said:
2 years with Lamar Smith and lesser #'s but a more potent passing attack. 2 years in the playoffs.
2years with Ricky Williams and and a less potent passing game, no playoffs.
What I see last year was a team with a new OC, a new QB, a completely new O-line(5 new starters) No David Boston, No O-gun.
But yet you wanna focus on us not having Ricky Williams.
I am not arguing that if we had a better passing team. What I am arguing is that with better passing numbers and less rushing numbers we were a playoff team but not with the opposite.
I agree that we do need a RB. Just not in the 1st round especially #2 overall. We can get Fason, Barber or Arrington in the 3rd who have the potential to be very good RB'S in the league.