rather have matt moorewere not getting Manning mark my words, on to the next one flynn? tannehill?
lets move on were not getting him, we dont even have a meeting set up with him, we contacted his reps the day he was released and he still hasn't given us a definitive time for a meeting, but who flew right out and met with the broncos and cards, I think that is very telling and speaks volumes as to how he views us, he might sneak us in for a quick meeting but I doubt it will mean anything, were not getting Manning mark my words, on to the next one flynn? tannehill?
It's really getting ridiculous now, now Arizona is the co-favorites? Stong "indications" ? What were those, he didn't smile when the the Dolphins name was mentioned? How can these "reporters" get away with this crap? Every big story they are so irresponsible and just inventing crap. It's so frustrating and annoying. Why is reporting such a joke these days?
rather have matt moore
Why? Because he went to those two first? Silly - which is what you'd expect from the ESPN clowns.
plus most of the teams that need a qb will fill that need this year. might give us a good shot at barkley.Me too. I will be pissed if we dont get Manning. However, I could live with it if we stick with Moore in the case we dont get Manning. If we dont get Manning, the last thing I want is to go overpay a guy who isnt even better than Moore(no other available QBs are) or spend the 8th pick on a longshot QB. IMHO there are only 2 QBs available worth getting. Manning and Luck. Luck isnt even technically available because the Colts have that locked down and wouldnt trade that pick for the entire franchise.
THe news organizations are playing this to the hilt for readership. The keep the public in a constant spin.
Scheftler is just enjoying all the attention. Just ignore him, that is how you can hurt him the most.