Fish Castoff D-Line vs the "Browncos" | Page 9 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Fish Castoff D-Line vs the "Browncos"

Okay, I don't think anyone has said your rushing game sucks. If they have then they are nuts. Every year you prove you can run. What I've read is that we believe that our Dline has enough talent to limit the ground game and not get run on for 200 yards and can cause Plummer some trouble. If you put up 1000 yard rushers every year we need to try and stop that in our game. We believe that it is a key to our success this weekend. Plus if we can run on your D line. I think your Oline has been complimented on every thread I've read about the game as well as your LBs so we have not bashed every position.
 
Hoofbeats said:
I find it pretty hillarious that Fish fans are focusing on Denver's defensive line instead of their own. Sure, we brought in some players who were considered underachievers in Cleveland, but it seems to be lost on you guys that they were ADDED to a unit that was already 4th against the run and 4th overall in the NFL last year. Nobody questions that Brown, Warren and Ekuban are extremely talented. They were all high draft picks. That has not been their problem. The NFL is full of players who only achieved their potential once they changed teams, so this is nothing new. Miami, on the other hand ALSO brought in new defensive line guys. However you brought in old guys that are well past their prime, while we moved older guys off the roster or to the 2nd unit (Marco Coleman). This is odd considering you are the team that went 4-12 and we went 10-6, so you should be the ones rebuilding with younger guys.

Before you start bashing the performance of the "Browncos" last season it might be nice to look at how some of your own D-line castoffs are likely to perform. Traylor is 70 pounds overweight, with limited mobility and makes a good space eater but can't do the one thing you MUST do to stop Denver's running game; move well laterally. Holliday was a puzzling pickup to me. Kansas City's "defense" was pathetic the last two years so ANYBODY leaviing the Chiefs should be looked at with extreme skepticism. In the two Kansas City games last season, Denver runners gained 299 yards on 48 carries, or a whopping 6.2 yards a pop. It was even worse in 2003 as Denver went through the Chiefs "defense" like a hot knife through butter, averaging 34.5 points, 488 yards total offense and 224 on the ground, going off for a ridiculous 7 yards per carry rushing. For the 2004 season, KC's "defense" was horrible, finishing 28th against the run in yard per rush and dead last in yards per pass. They were no better in 2003, finishing last against the run and 29th overall. These dismal performances were actually considerably worse than Cleveland, which finished 27th and 16th respectively last year. The biggest difference however, is that these "Browncos" are not only talented, but young as well. Contrast this with the old guys Miami brought in. Keith Traylor is a fat old tub-o-goo whose good for one thing...clogging up the middle. He was effectively hidden in New England playing with the Pats superior talent around him. Unfortunately for you, Denver LOVES going against guys like this because they're stationary targets. Running against guys like Traylor and Holliday will always put smiles on the faces of Mike Anderson and Tatum Bell. The addition of Kevin Carter may help some, but Carter is 31, and not the player he used to be. His sack totals were somewhat inflated in St. Louis, which scored so much that the other team was frequently forced to pass in order to catch up, giving him the ability to forget about the run and just go after the QB early and often. Carter was let go by the Titans after 4 mediocre seasons; a team that finished 27th in total defense last year and 30th against the pass. So while Fish fans may think the "Browncos" will be easy pickin's, castoffs from sorry defenses lilke Kansas City and Tennessee plus an obese Traylor should hardly invoke confidence against our running game.

It's also quite funny to hear you talking about the Fish running over these guys based on their performance against them last year in Cleveland. The Fish scored only 10 points against Cleveland last year and gained a mediocre 280 yards in total offense. Adding a rookie runner and a career backup QB who can't get out of his own way doesn't qualify you to think it will be any better this time going up against these same guys surrounded by the fastest linebackers in the NFL and 2 All Pro defensive backs in the secondary.

The NFL's 4th best defense from 2004 added All Pro DE Trevor Pryce, a young, quick, potentially dominating DT in Warren, increased speed and depth off the edges in Ekuban and Engleberger and a high motor run stuffer in Myers. Anything physical freak Courtney Brown adds is merely gravy. If he stays healthy, this is a top 3 D-Line. Miami will not be improved on defense by adding old, slow, over-the-hill players like Traylor, Holliday and Carter to go with their other geezers like Seau and Thomas. Another 4-12 season is a distinct possibility. Barring a weather related equalizer in the form of a mud hole for a field, Denver should rush for 180-200 yards and probably sacks Gus at least 4 times. Giving Shanahan more than a week to prepare against a rookie coach is a recipe for a Denver win.

Prediction: Denver 34 Miami 10

I got an idea for there hero. You say 34-10?? How bout we set up a little Paypal wager. I'll even cut ya a break and instead of a 24 point win, I'll let ya get out with just giving up 14. Give me 14 on a $100.00 bet. Get back to me soon so I can set it up. If not give up the looney predictions. :shakeno:
 
WharfRat said:
Not all of us ;)

Just like there are Bronco Homers, there are Dolphin Homers.... I'd say considering many of the Bronco fans that are posting today, haven't been here very long, the percentage of "team bashing" is about equal on both sides....
It's the regular season...:evil: Homerism abounds.
 
Canadi-Phin said:
Okay, I don't think anyone has said your rusing game sucks. If they have then they are nuts. Every year you prove you can run. What I've read is that we believe that our Dline has enough talent to limit the ground game and not get run on for 200 yards and can cause Plummer some trouble. If you put up 1000 yard rushers every year we need to try and stop that in our game. We believe that it is a key to our success this weekend. Plus if we can run on your D line. I think your Oline has been complimented on every thread I've read about the game as well as your LBs so we have not bashed every position.

Not really. I've been saving all the stupid comments. Here are a few of my favorites.

Truedus said:
$1 that NO Denver RB gets more than 65 yards rushing on our D.

hdjetta6316 said:
You Heard it here first. The brocos O-line is in decline!!! Have a nice day.
 
KTOWNFINFAN said:
I got an idea for there hero. You say 34-10?? How bout we set up a little Paypal wager. I'll even cut ya a break and instead of a 24 point win, I'll let ya get out with just giving up 14. Give me 14 on a $100.00 bet. Get back to me soon so I can set it up. If not give up the looney predictions. :shakeno:
I have two vices. Gambling isn't one of them. I do promise to be back win or lose however...and in weeks 7 and 12...

I'll be the Fishes biggest fan.;)
 
fishsticks said:
So hoofbeats posts a indepth football related post and all you guys have is go away trolls?

No, he posted an inaccurate, irrelevant one. He tried to say that the browns DL was better than the KC DL so therefore the additions the Browns made were better. This is a ridiculous comparison. The Browncos added three Brown players. The Dolphins got one player from KC who was playing out of position on their line. He also ignored the addition of probowler Kevin Carter. Basically he implied that our DL's effectiveness has some relationship to KC's effectiveness last year and there is no relationship.

He also tried to say that Denver was just improving a good line while Miami was not. However, Miami was one year and several injuries removed from being just as highly rated. He either didn't know it or just ignored it. Either way it seemed redundant to repeat what has been explained in other threads.
 
Hoofbeats said:
No you haven't...this place looks like most...some good posters, some who aren't. It's the same all over...except in Jokeland of course.:lol:

Right so there really is no reason to point that fact out.
 
rafael said:
Basically he implied that our DL's effectiveness has some relationship to KC's effectiveness last year and there is no relationship.
Oh the irony...:rofl3:
 
rafael said:
No, he posted an inaccurate, irrelevant one. He tried to say that the browns DL was better than the KC DL so therefore the additions the Browns made were better. This is a ridiculous comparison. The Browncos added three Brown players. The Dolphins got one player from KC who was playing out of position on their line. He also ignored the addition of probowler Kevin Carter. Basically he implied that our DL's effectiveness has some relationship to KC's effectiveness last year and there is no relationship.
I did not compare the Browns and KC D-lines. I compared players cast off from both those teams as being equally deserving of question marks, mainly because Fish fans have assumed your castoffs are better than our castoffs, despite they fact they are much older. Second, I did not ignore the Carter pickup...I commented that he was past his prime, which he is. He last made the pro bowl in 2002, mainly on reputation.
He also tried to say that Denver was just improving a good line while Miami was not. However, Miami was one year and several injuries removed from being just as highly rated. He either didn't know it or just ignored it. Either way it seemed redundant to repeat what has been explained in other threads.
Denver was improving a good line and Miami was not. You gave up 12 fewer yards than Cleveland on the ground last year, the same team you are bashing in here. Pointing out the fact that adding OLD players past their prime to your defense may not change that is very relevant; especially since you are criticizing our YOUNGER castoffs while praising your OLD castoffs.
 
Hoofbeats said:
I did not compare the Browns and KC D-lines. I compared players cast off from both those teams as being equally deserving of question marks, mainly because Fish fans have assumed your castoffs are better than our castoffs, despite they fact they are much older. Second, I did not ignore the Carter pickup...I commented that he was past his prime, which he is. He last made the pro bowl in 2002, mainly on reputation.

Denver was improving a good line and Miami was not. You gave up 12 fewer yards than Cleveland on the ground last year, the same team you are bashing in here. Pointing out the fact that adding OLD players past their prime to your defense may not change that is very relevant; especially since you are criticizing our YOUNGER castoffs while praising your OLD castoffs.
You seem to be basing much of your comparison on the ages of the players; specifically the fact that the new donkey DLinemen are much younger than the new Fins DLinemen. The only problem with that arguement is that the play of most DLinemen doesn't erode (as fast as it does at other positions) as a player ages; mainly because they rely on strength more than speed. Often times (as players perfect techniques) their play tends to improve as they get older.
 
Kaylore said:
Oh the irony...:rofl3:
ya thats funny 1 have 1 guy from KC who isnt starting you have 4 Clev guys with 3 starting big difference.
 
Hoofbeats said:
I find it pretty hillarious that Fish fans are focusing on Denver's defensive line instead of their own. Sure, we brought in some players who were considered underachievers in Cleveland, but it seems to be lost on you guys that they were ADDED to a unit that was already 4th against the run and 4th overall in the NFL last year. Nobody questions that Brown, Warren and Ekuban are extremely talented. They were all high draft picks. That has not been their problem. The NFL is full of players who only achieved their potential once they changed teams, so this is nothing new. Miami, on the other hand ALSO brought in new defensive line guys. However you brought in old guys that are well past their prime, while we moved older guys off the roster or to the 2nd unit (Marco Coleman). This is odd considering you are the team that went 4-12 and we went 10-6, so you should be the ones rebuilding with younger guys.

Before you start bashing the performance of the "Browncos" last season it might be nice to look at how some of your own D-line castoffs are likely to perform. Traylor is 70 pounds overweight, with limited mobility and makes a good space eater but can't do the one thing you MUST do to stop Denver's running game; move well laterally. Holliday was a puzzling pickup to me. Kansas City's "defense" was pathetic the last two years so ANYBODY leaviing the Chiefs should be looked at with extreme skepticism. In the two Kansas City games last season, Denver runners gained 299 yards on 48 carries, or a whopping 6.2 yards a pop. It was even worse in 2003 as Denver went through the Chiefs "defense" like a hot knife through butter, averaging 34.5 points, 488 yards total offense and 224 on the ground, going off for a ridiculous 7 yards per carry rushing. For the 2004 season, KC's "defense" was horrible, finishing 28th against the run in yard per rush and dead last in yards per pass. They were no better in 2003, finishing last against the run and 29th overall. These dismal performances were actually considerably worse than Cleveland, which finished 27th and 16th respectively last year. The biggest difference however, is that these "Browncos" are not only talented, but young as well. Contrast this with the old guys Miami brought in. Keith Traylor is a fat old tub-o-goo whose good for one thing...clogging up the middle. He was effectively hidden in New England playing with the Pats superior talent around him. Unfortunately for you, Denver LOVES going against guys like this because they're stationary targets. Running against guys like Traylor and Holliday will always put smiles on the faces of Mike Anderson and Tatum Bell. The addition of Kevin Carter may help some, but Carter is 31, and not the player he used to be. His sack totals were somewhat inflated in St. Louis, which scored so much that the other team was frequently forced to pass in order to catch up, giving him the ability to forget about the run and just go after the QB early and often. Carter was let go by the Titans after 4 mediocre seasons; a team that finished 27th in total defense last year and 30th against the pass. So while Fish fans may think the "Browncos" will be easy pickin's, castoffs from sorry defenses lilke Kansas City and Tennessee plus an obese Traylor should hardly invoke confidence against our running game.

It's also quite funny to hear you talking about the Fish running over these guys based on their performance against them last year in Cleveland. The Fish scored only 10 points against Cleveland last year and gained a mediocre 280 yards in total offense. Adding a rookie runner and a career backup QB who can't get out of his own way doesn't qualify you to think it will be any better this time going up against these same guys surrounded by the fastest linebackers in the NFL and 2 All Pro defensive backs in the secondary.

The NFL's 4th best defense from 2004 added All Pro DE Trevor Pryce, a young, quick, potentially dominating DT in Warren, increased speed and depth off the edges in Ekuban and Engleberger and a high motor run stuffer in Myers. Anything physical freak Courtney Brown adds is merely gravy. If he stays healthy, this is a top 3 D-Line. Miami will not be improved on defense by adding old, slow, over-the-hill players like Traylor, Holliday and Carter to go with their other geezers like Seau and Thomas. Another 4-12 season is a distinct possibility. Barring a weather related equalizer in the form of a mud hole for a field, Denver should rush for 180-200 yards and probably sacks Gus at least 4 times. Giving Shanahan more than a week to prepare against a rookie coach is a recipe for a Denver win.

Prediction: Denver 34 Miami 10


That was a long f****** post. I stopped at the 26th line....there's got to be a limit on this kind of nonsense.
 
Warren has been a beast in the pre-season, he will be the key, if he plays like everyone thinks he can, he will help your LB's, if he plays like he did with the Browns, your LB's will be playing on there backs.
 
Hoofbeats said:
I find it pretty hillarious that Fish fans are focusing on Denver's defensive line instead of their own. Sure, we brought in some players who were considered underachievers in Cleveland, but it seems to be lost on you guys that they were ADDED to a unit that was already 4th against the run and 4th overall in the NFL last year. Nobody questions that Brown, Warren and Ekuban are extremely talented. They were all high draft picks. That has not been their problem. The NFL is full of players who only achieved their potential once they changed teams, so this is nothing new. Miami, on the other hand ALSO brought in new defensive line guys. However you brought in old guys that are well past their prime, while we moved older guys off the roster or to the 2nd unit (Marco Coleman). This is odd considering you are the team that went 4-12 and we went 10-6, so you should be the ones rebuilding with younger guys.

Before you start bashing the performance of the "Browncos" last season it might be nice to look at how some of your own D-line castoffs are likely to perform. Traylor is 70 pounds overweight, with limited mobility and makes a good space eater but can't do the one thing you MUST do to stop Denver's running game; move well laterally. Holliday was a puzzling pickup to me. Kansas City's "defense" was pathetic the last two years so ANYBODY leaviing the Chiefs should be looked at with extreme skepticism. In the two Kansas City games last season, Denver runners gained 299 yards on 48 carries, or a whopping 6.2 yards a pop. It was even worse in 2003 as Denver went through the Chiefs "defense" like a hot knife through butter, averaging 34.5 points, 488 yards total offense and 224 on the ground, going off for a ridiculous 7 yards per carry rushing. For the 2004 season, KC's "defense" was horrible, finishing 28th against the run in yard per rush and dead last in yards per pass. They were no better in 2003, finishing last against the run and 29th overall. These dismal performances were actually considerably worse than Cleveland, which finished 27th and 16th respectively last year. The biggest difference however, is that these "Browncos" are not only talented, but young as well. Contrast this with the old guys Miami brought in. Keith Traylor is a fat old tub-o-goo whose good for one thing...clogging up the middle. He was effectively hidden in New England playing with the Pats superior talent around him. Unfortunately for you, Denver LOVES going against guys like this because they're stationary targets. Running against guys like Traylor and Holliday will always put smiles on the faces of Mike Anderson and Tatum Bell. The addition of Kevin Carter may help some, but Carter is 31, and not the player he used to be. His sack totals were somewhat inflated in St. Louis, which scored so much that the other team was frequently forced to pass in order to catch up, giving him the ability to forget about the run and just go after the QB early and often. Carter was let go by the Titans after 4 mediocre seasons; a team that finished 27th in total defense last year and 30th against the pass. So while Fish fans may think the "Browncos" will be easy pickin's, castoffs from sorry defenses lilke Kansas City and Tennessee plus an obese Traylor should hardly invoke confidence against our running game.

It's also quite funny to hear you talking about the Fish running over these guys based on their performance against them last year in Cleveland. The Fish scored only 10 points against Cleveland last year and gained a mediocre 280 yards in total offense. Adding a rookie runner and a career backup QB who can't get out of his own way doesn't qualify you to think it will be any better this time going up against these same guys surrounded by the fastest linebackers in the NFL and 2 All Pro defensive backs in the secondary.

The NFL's 4th best defense from 2004 added All Pro DE Trevor Pryce, a young, quick, potentially dominating DT in Warren, increased speed and depth off the edges in Ekuban and Engleberger and a high motor run stuffer in Myers. Anything physical freak Courtney Brown adds is merely gravy. If he stays healthy, this is a top 3 D-Line. Miami will not be improved on defense by adding old, slow, over-the-hill players like Traylor, Holliday and Carter to go with their other geezers like Seau and Thomas. Another 4-12 season is a distinct possibility. Barring a weather related equalizer in the form of a mud hole for a field, Denver should rush for 180-200 yards and probably sacks Gus at least 4 times. Giving Shanahan more than a week to prepare against a rookie coach is a recipe for a Denver win.

Prediction: Denver 34 Miami 10

Why is this so difficult to understand? I am not reading nine pages worth of this so I will merely comment to your original post.

First and foremost. You keep talking about how you only added to your defense. That isn't true. Reggie Hayward who had over 10 sacks last season for your Broncos, is no longer there. That is a big blow, like it or not.


Ok, on to defending our guys. First and foremost, the obese Keith Traylor. I love fat Keith Traylor. He reminds me of Tim Bowens who, was pretty darn good at clgging up the lanes for years in Miami. You talk about how he cannot move laterally which is what you line makes teams do. big deal. Keith is a double wide Traylor ( yes the pun was intended ), he doesn't need to move laterally, he is already there. The man is wider than to of your smallish linemen. Anderson and Bell are going to have to run aruond him and not get sucked into his gravitational pull. Furthermore, We don't need Traylor to move laterally, that is why we have Thomas and Seau and Crowder. See, Traylor gobbles up the blockers which allows our linebackers to shoot the gaps. It may not work every play, but that is the theory anyway.

Onto Holliday. I like how you try to pin KC's defensive woes on one player. A player who was hurt and only started in nine games nonetheless. The guy cannot be blamed for last season's ineptness in KC when we wasn't even playing an he? Furthermore if you want to look at two years ago ( and it is obvious you do ), he had 6 sacks a forced fumble and defelcted two passes. Not too shabby. However, in terms of stopping the run, he isn't really going to be a factor. You see, he will more than likely be in at the DT spot when obvious passing downs occur. He is not to be counted on in the run game, but you seem to forget that point, maybe you just didn't know.

Kevin Carter. He also had 6 sacks last year and has over 85 in his career. Like it or not, he is a talented player who has looked great all preseason long. He is splitting time between the DE and DT spots depending on how we line up.

You talk about the age of some of our veterans and how Kevin Carter is 31, and not the player he used to be. Well, checking your roster the following people just across your line are 30 or older:
Marco Coleman, 35
Chuckie Nworkie, 30
Trevor Price, 30, coming of injury
And following them is Ebenezer Ekuban who is 29 as well as Michael Myers who is also 29.


My point? My point is this. A lot of the guys you have picked up or already had on your roster are not the players they used to be. Furthermore, the players they used to be weren't that good. Honestly, do you think these players who are hitting the "old age" of 30 are going to improve? Maybe a little bit but it is doubtful, that they improve like you guys think they will.

I see a potshot at Thomas and Seau as well. Ok, so they are older and have lost a step. I give you that, we do have great depth with Spragan ( you guys may have heard of him? ) and Channing Crowder who was the steal of the draft and has already found himself starting.

The reason Miami is so down on your D-line is, well, they sucked last year. The Browns player were not very good. You talk about how we only scored 10 points against them last year, but that was mainly do to two very bad teams playing each other. It usually either becomes a boring low scoring slugfest or a high scoring affair where no one can stop anything. Miami's offense last season was horrible. Sammy Morris was our main running threat and he was a converted fullback. Fiedler and Feeley battle to find out who was the worst QB ever and the o-line was swiss cheese. A heper moneky with a hard on could have penetrated that line. And in the end, we still beat the browns with those players you highly regard so much.
 
Back
Top Bottom