Frerotte play by play analysis | Page 4 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Frerotte play by play analysis

The best thing about this post, which is horribly biased and about as factual as the Iraqi information ministers coverage of the US invasion, is this quote:

Now this is not to say that Feeley or Frerotte is better. This is simply fact nothing more nothing less. The facts show that in less time Feeley was more productive with the 1st string offense then Frerotte was. He was more accurate and moved the chains though the air more. Frerotte moved the chains once through passing and the only scoring drive was all Ricky none of Frerotte.

The actual production is quite different. I think Palm Beach Post put it best:

Frerotte's passer rating through two games (84.6) is almost double Feeley's (42.7). Frerotte has thrown one touchdown  with no interceptions  and led the team to 13 points. Feeley has been intercepted once, has not led a scoring drive and has the shortest long pass of any of the four quarterbacks (22 yards).

In your make believe world, Feeley might certaintly be more productive, but to the rest of us, bound by the chains of "realitiy", things look a bit differently.
 
WitheringPlant said:
When you have 8 "lol"s in a play by play analysis, you kinda lose credability.
He's still sitting there with the dam TIVO telling you what happened play for play...That's alright with me! Thanks for the report, GRYPHONK
 
BringBackShula said:
He's still sitting there with the dam TIVO telling you what happened play for play...That's alright with me! Thanks for the report, GRYPHONK


When your trying to stretch the truth by doing so it is not ok by me. Blaming a holding and 3rd and 14 on Gus instead of seth isnt fair. A LB barely getting a hand on a ball that would have been a TD if he barely misses it and saying Gus threw it with no one near.......or convienienty saying he overthrew chambers when chambers got his hands on it and should have pulled it down. Not alright with me place blame where it belongs not just cause ou have it out for a guy.
 
FinaticPatch said:
When your trying to stretch the truth by doing so it is not ok by me. Blaming a holding and 3rd and 14 on Gus instead of seth isnt fair. A LB barely getting a hand on a ball that would have been a TD if he barely misses it and saying Gus threw it with no one near.......or convienienty saying he overthrew chambers when chambers got his hands on it and should have pulled it down. Not alright with me place blame where it belongs not just cause ou have it out for a guy.

I like to call it: Putting the ball where only the receiver can catch it.

Once the QB and his receivers can get a rythym together you might see the majority of his balls caught instead of being a couple of steps behind or in front..

This is pure speculation on my part though.
 
Ok i'm gald i stopped reading this post after one line............
 
touborg said:
The best thing about this post, which is horribly biased and about as factual as the Iraqi information ministers coverage of the US invasion, is this quote:



The actual production is quite different. I think Palm Beach Post put it best:



In your make believe world, Feeley might certaintly be more productive, but to the rest of us, bound by the chains of "realitiy", things look a bit differently.


I think that there are some world class blinders being worn by the Gusketeers to thikn that that qb rating is any indication of what these qb's have done or what they have happened to be the benefit of!
 
Oregonfinfan said:
I think that there are some world class blinders being worn by the Gusketeers to thikn that that qb rating is any indication of what these qb's have done or what they have happened to be the benefit of!

Please read my posts when commenting on them. I'm talking about productivity.
 
Back
Top Bottom