That post had nothing at all to do with anything you have said. Easy killer
Now I'm expecting perfection even though I never once said that anywhere. Okay...
Who's being logical now?
I explained my logic earlier. You can disagree with it. That's okay. A statement isn't logical only because you agree with the statement though.
Doesn't Andrew Luck shout out the same thing before the snap? While it is funny that while we as fans had seen the go/go-go cadence by Tannehill, does the defense really have that big of an advantage? They'd have a split second to decide if they're going to drop back on a pass or come up to stop the run if they "knew it was coming".
Wait a second,it's either "Thank you" or "Thank You Thank You" whats with the 3rd Thank you?
Doesn't Andrew Luck shout out the same thing before the snap? While it is funny that while we as fans had seen the go/go-go cadence by Tannehill, does the defense really have that big of an advantage? They'd have a split second to decide if they're going to drop back on a pass or come up to stop the run if they "knew it was coming".
maybe coming from you it will be better accepted than from me. i voiced the same opinion and got told i was a moron. just not enough time for the defense process the info and react accordingly. if it was the case we would have some huge gains off of play fakes just waiting to be exploited.
Well it would take the guessing out of a play action pass!
holy crap...another logical post, by another logical poster! Lets keep it going guys!
The lack of understanding of basic game management in this thread is confounding.
There are two ways to manage pre-snap - try to confuse the hell out of them (see P. Manning), or dangle the obvious in front of them and use it against them if they take the bait.
Yes, you keep the count the same. By doing so, you dare the defense to react on it. If you catch them anticipating a play based off your count, then and only then do you trick them with it. With that said, these defenses aren't dumb. They know that it can and will be used against them, so they don't react.
This is similar to running the same plays out of the same formation. Let's take the I formation. Every time you line up in the I you run. Does that mean that the defense is going to put 11 men in the box because they "know" you are going to run? No. Even if you've ran out of the I 100 times, they are still going to be prepared for the pass as well. Lining up in the I doesn't tip them off. If they are dumb enough to think your formation means run only, they you've got them right where you want them.
The exact same thing applies to the count. If the defense is dumb enough to react, then you've got them right where you want them.
Bottom line - NOTHING is being given away with the snap count the way it is, because the defense isn't playing the snap count.