Garrard's Stats better than ........
- Thread starter Mlapd
- Start date
dlockz
Hall Of Famer
very very true
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
- Messages
- 60,200
- Reaction score
- 158,569
Sherman is pretty creative so you never know.
miamiron
Active Roster
AND WE DO??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Hartline...1 td in the past 26 games
Bess.....3 tds and 51 receptions...
Gates ...0 tds.......2 receptions
Moore....00000000000000000
Pruitt.....00000000000000000
Wallace...0000000000000000
add a rookie here___________
By far ONE of the worst group of wide receivers I have seen
in the past 42 years of watching the NFL
Good pickup.. Someone who can push Moore or possibly replace him. Garrard is better than most hater on this site give him credit for. He put up some great stats with dismal offensive lines and no-name wide outs.
utahphinsfan
Club Member
Don't forget The HC in Jville was Del Rio.
Del Rio = Fisher minus personality & talent.
Del Rio = Fisher minus personality & talent.
dolfanduwayne63
Practice Squad
Since It's just a one year deal and considering what was left It could be ok for now but we still must address this position in the draft.
Crazysimon
Scout Team
- Joined
- May 4, 2007
- Messages
- 843
- Reaction score
- 6
neither do we.
Crazysimon
Scout Team
- Joined
- May 4, 2007
- Messages
- 843
- Reaction score
- 6
mega-fin-love
Just trust me
I will be pissed if Garrard is the starter. I'm ok with him as our #2 and I'm not saying he shouldn't be given a chance to fight for the starting spot but Matt Moore should beat him out easily. God help us if Garrard starts this year. I will be one unhappy camper
Is this the steal of the FA, he's 2 years younger than Peyton and has great career numbers:
Look at that TD/INT ratio, why was he cut one week before the season last year? Was it because he was hurt? That was such a weird move last year and I could never understand it. Is he healthy, he had a herniated disc was it crippling? I just don't see how getting a Pro Bowl QB for so cheap is not a win/ win . He's probably better than FLynn and Smith if healthy. So if he's actually healthy we just got extremely lucky.
I always thought he was a decent QB for the Jaguars and I remember being shocked that he was cut like that. What part of this story am I missing?
|
Look at that TD/INT ratio, why was he cut one week before the season last year? Was it because he was hurt? That was such a weird move last year and I could never understand it. Is he healthy, he had a herniated disc was it crippling? I just don't see how getting a Pro Bowl QB for so cheap is not a win/ win . He's probably better than FLynn and Smith if healthy. So if he's actually healthy we just got extremely lucky.
I always thought he was a decent QB for the Jaguars and I remember being shocked that he was cut like that. What part of this story am I missing?
mega-fin-love
Just trust me
Garrard will not start next year unless Moore is injured.
He had the one big year in 2007, including the playoff win at Pittsburgh when Garrard converted the 4th and 1 with a long run off the left side, and Garrard played well when the Jaguars gave unbeaten New England a scare for three quarters.
Then Garrard quickly regressed when seemingly entering his peak years. I don't pretend to know what happened but one buddy in Las Vegas caught onto it quickly. He insisted in early 2008 that Garrard was a shell of the player of a year earlier, making poor reads and missing receivers. I wish I had invested more confidently in his advice. Jacksonville was a woeful 4-12 against the spread in 2008. You almost never see anything like that in the NFL.
Again, I don't care about looking at tape. Stepping back and evaluating the big picture, it's a 34 year old quarterback who was coming off some subpar seasons, then cut and out of the league for a year. For every time you'll hit big on that type of investment I'd conservatively estimate you'll either have no change or a net negative at least 8 times as often.
Jeff Ireland doesn't understand mathematical realities like that. He's got money to toy around with, and no worries about the smile disappearing from his face.
The idea is to have great players at the premium positions and pay them handsomely, then take a gamble that they'll stay on the field and you won't have to use the bargain basement backups. Ireland constructs a team exactly the opposite, with a couple of moderately paid players at the position, chewing up nearly as much as one terrific player would demand.
If I didn't know better I'd think Jeff Ireland designed our stadium. Where was he circa '85 and '86?
Then Garrard quickly regressed when seemingly entering his peak years. I don't pretend to know what happened but one buddy in Las Vegas caught onto it quickly. He insisted in early 2008 that Garrard was a shell of the player of a year earlier, making poor reads and missing receivers. I wish I had invested more confidently in his advice. Jacksonville was a woeful 4-12 against the spread in 2008. You almost never see anything like that in the NFL.
Again, I don't care about looking at tape. Stepping back and evaluating the big picture, it's a 34 year old quarterback who was coming off some subpar seasons, then cut and out of the league for a year. For every time you'll hit big on that type of investment I'd conservatively estimate you'll either have no change or a net negative at least 8 times as often.
Jeff Ireland doesn't understand mathematical realities like that. He's got money to toy around with, and no worries about the smile disappearing from his face.
The idea is to have great players at the premium positions and pay them handsomely, then take a gamble that they'll stay on the field and you won't have to use the bargain basement backups. Ireland constructs a team exactly the opposite, with a couple of moderately paid players at the position, chewing up nearly as much as one terrific player would demand.
If I didn't know better I'd think Jeff Ireland designed our stadium. Where was he circa '85 and '86?
You're going to ignore 2010 when they went 8-8 and Garrard had a 90. passer rating and went to the Pro Bowl? Sounds fair. . .he was not coming off a subpar season, actually his best season and he elected to the probowl, why are you distorting facts?