Go, Go Go | Page 10 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Go, Go Go

I really dont think the defense has time to think about in the half second for the ball to be snapped regardless of "Go" or "Go Go"
 
LMAO. You obviously have NO idea about football. I have ALWAYS won; as a player and coach. So you would lose against me with that pathetic crap.

Won....again you point to your credentials as evidence to your expertise...may I ask what they are...
 
And you have yet to disprove me. So I will be waiting.

If the Go/Go,Go thing was such an issue the Dolphins would have the worse offense in the NFL considering how poor their offensive line plays and yet they are not and are still averaging more than 21 points per game (more then last season)....granted I think Omar is an idiot but he even said it is a non issue especially after talking to several people around the league and he was the one leading the charge on this phenomenon.
 
And you have yet to disprove me. So I will be waiting.

I did, in watching two games and seeing nothing whatsoever to support what you say. You "say" you are an expert, and watch every game on tape. For me, at this point of offering nothing to back up anything, it's all BS.

As far as I know, you're some kid on a computer busting chops with no knowledge or expertise. :)

IF you wish to change that perception, all ya gotta do is post something real. Otherwise, IMO, you're likely a nice kid who wants to seem like he knows something, and when challenged, does not.
 
If the Go/Go,Go thing was such an issue the Dolphins would have the worse offense in the NFL considering how poor their offensive line plays and yet they are not and are still averaging more than 21 points per game (more then last season)....granted I think Omar is an idiot but he even said it is a non issue especially after talking to several people around the league and he was the one leading the charge on this phenomenon.

Not speaking to the topic of Go/Go-Go.... but instead to the bad offense....

Only offense that is worse than the Fins in the AFC are the Jags.... That's about as bad as it gets.
 
I did, in watching two games and seeing nothing whatsoever to support what you say. You "say" you are an expert, and watch every game on tape. For me, at this point of offering nothing to back up anything, it's all BS.

As far as I know, you're some kid on a computer busting chops with no knowledge or expertise. :)

IF you wish to change that perception, all ya gotta do is post something real. Otherwise, IMO, you're likely a nice kid who wants to seem like he knows something, and when challenged, does not.

Wow. That's pretty childish right there. Seems to me you're being the kid here. I've said why I know that the snap count is a problem. You do not agree with me, just as I do not agree with you. There comes a point where it's pointless to even continue the argument. That point was bypassed a long time ago. You will continue to think you're correct and I will continue to think that I am correct. End of discussion. It's especially pointless when something like this causes hard feelings. I'm not on this board for that. Once we started with the taunts (which I admit I began) then that was far enough. We'll just have to agree to disagree and move on.
 
And you have yet to disprove me. So I will be waiting.

:lol:

Just like Junc, spinning arguments and evading topics. Child play.

---------- Post added at 04:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:31 PM ----------

Also what does me playing at FDHS in SC have to do with anything.

2 stars in the NFL went there
 
Wow. That's pretty childish right there. Seems to me you're being the kid here. I've said why I know that the snap count is a problem. You do not agree with me, just as I do not agree with you. There comes a point where it's pointless to even continue the argument. That point was bypassed a long time ago. You will continue to think you're correct and I will continue to think that I am correct. End of discussion. It's especially pointless when something like this causes hard feelings. I'm not on this board for that. Once we started with the taunts (which I admit I began) then that was far enough. We'll just have to agree to disagree and move on.

Agree but, you have been putting up many a post on this, and all we are asking for is an example or two in a game, which you cannot do. I spent over an hour in looking for reasons you may be right, and there were none. You cannot spend any time to support what you say, and still keep on thinking you are right.

Did you re-watch the games, and see that you were not? That is my guess.
 
Agree but, you have been putting up many a post on this, and all we are asking for is an example or two in a game, which you cannot do. I spent over an hour in looking for reasons you may be right, and there were none. You cannot spend any time to support what you say, and still keep on thinking you are right.

Did you re-watch the games, and see that you were not? That is my guess.

I am NOT incorrect. Goodness. I really wanted to drop this. But okay, here goes: There are many other knowledgeable football fans, like you and myself, who do agree with my side of this. I'm not talking only on this forum. I'm talking guys I have coached with and played with over the years (some ex-NFL players) - some Dolphins fans, some not. It is a tip off, particularly for the front 7. It's a tip off for them to know that they can either come hard at the passer or just have to maintain running lane integrity. This is also a disadvantage to our offensive line and it puts them in a much tougher situation. As a former QB, I know how important a snap count is in keeping a defense off-balance. Not only for the reason of not knowing when to attack, but also because you do not want to clue them in on what type of play you are going to run. While the defense does not know exactly where the run is going, it does effectively tell them that one is coming and puts additional pressure on the offensive line to block perfectly. And it is incredibly obvious that our offensive line is not blocking perfectly. Save about 2 or 3 runs, we've struggled mightily to go beyond a couple yards and a cloud of dust and we've seen many a play being stopped for a loss or no gain. This is evidence to me. It is not coincidental, IMO, that we've had three (I believe) of our worst rushing totals in our franchise' history this year. No question our o-line is not great, but I truly believe that we are not doing them any favors with the snap count. Is it also coincidental that we are on course to break the NFL record for sacks allowed and will almost assuredly surpass the team record for sacks allowed. I don't think it's coincidence. I think these stats are absolute proof. But what would be the best proof of all would be to see us change this cadence thing up and see what a difference it would make. Unless we do that, ultimately, I don't believe either one of us could be proven 100% correct or incorrect. Cadence, to me, matters a lot - rather snap count. Our basic use of the snap count is so elementary that we can't even draw a defense off with a hard count because I just don't feel they would bite. Why? Because they know one go = pass and 2 gos = run.
 
Just give us all a game example to LOOK at? Ya got 7 games to pick from, you should be able to come up with a few. No?
 
I am NOT incorrect. Goodness. I really wanted to drop this. But okay, here goes: There are many other knowledgeable football fans, like you and myself, who do agree with my side of this. I'm not talking only on this forum. I'm talking guys I have coached with and played with over the years (some ex-NFL players) - some Dolphins fans, some not. It is a tip off, particularly for the front 7. It's a tip off for them to know that they can either come hard at the passer or just have to maintain running lane integrity. This is also a disadvantage to our offensive line and it puts them in a much tougher situation. As a former QB, I know how important a snap count is in keeping a defense off-balance. Not only for the reason of not knowing when to attack, but also because you do not want to clue them in on what type of play you are going to run. While the defense does not know exactly where the run is going, it does effectively tell them that one is coming and puts additional pressure on the offensive line to block perfectly. And it is incredibly obvious that our offensive line is not blocking perfectly. Save about 2 or 3 runs, we've struggled mightily to go beyond a couple yards and a cloud of dust and we've seen many a play being stopped for a loss or no gain. This is evidence to me. It is not coincidental, IMO, that we've had three (I believe) of our worst rushing totals in our franchise' history this year. No question our o-line is not great, but I truly believe that we are not doing them any favors with the snap count. Is it also coincidental that we are on course to break the NFL record for sacks allowed and will almost assuredly surpass the team record for sacks allowed. I don't think it's coincidence. I think these stats are absolute proof. But what would be the best proof of all would be to see us change this cadence thing up and see what a difference it would make. Unless we do that, ultimately, I don't believe either one of us could be proven 100% correct or incorrect. Cadence, to me, matters a lot - rather snap count. Our basic use of the snap count is so elementary that we can't even draw a defense off with a hard count because I just don't feel they would bite. Why? Because they know one go = pass and 2 gos = run.

Thats your trump card? You have friends that agree with you? Well goll-ee, I guess that settles it then.
 
I think it's not even a question. I just read that article from phinfoot:
"Yes, a player can react in that split second between GO and GO-GO. Furthermore, the Dolphins have ZERO third GO. Which means that the defense is not going to jump off-sides…have you seen Miami draw anyone off-sides? Have you seen a defense off-sides at all this year? Maybe once. There it was simple as day."

^ This is so true. We rarely if ever get the d-line to jump offsides. Add in the fact that Tannehill's been getting sacked like a sack of potatoes -- An average of 4 times per game.
Also, is it just me or does Tannehill not really call audibles much anymore? I feel like he's not digesting the defensive looks enough, and just following suit with Sherman's Go-Go-Go dance that's getting him and the team killed.
 
Thats your trump card? You have friends that agree with you? Well goll-ee, I guess that settles it then.

Really? Picking and choosing SOME of my words to post something sarcastic? How about read all of it. While you don't agree with me, I think I make a pretty good argument that I am correct. And I'm not going out of my way to be a smartass to do it. I tried to end this debate, then we have people like you who just want to to try to amp it up with BS like this because you have nothing constructive or intelligent to add.
 
Back
Top Bottom