I was strongly in the Tannehill corner 2 years ago, last season I was still 75% on it, and I'm not ready to say never....but we need some real competition for Tannehill this upcoming offseason. Obviously they don't believe Matt Moore would fare much better....which makes keeping him on the roster for 4 mil per season all the more perplexing to me.
I like what Hickey did, you can't rely on rookies to win you games, if your doing that your roster was poor to begin with. I blame Ireland for the state of the roster and I'm willing to give Hickey next offseason to see if he can continue to improve the roster. I think Landry will develop into a top-5 #2 receiver in this league...but that takes a little time.
Philbin. I am way down on Philbin at this point. The team flounders, doesn't play consistently with passion....makes mental errors on a regular basis. Bad timeclock management occurs regularly, and I don't understand when you running the ball well to just up and throw it on 2 and 1. And I just don't see the coaching staff "coaching up" the guys on the roster. Wallace has improved because he's not playing under Sherman's stupidity...but beyond that, how many players that are on the roster would you say are developing under this coaching staff? How many guys have we drafted that are better in year 2 or year 3 than when they were drafted? Not enough in my opinion....I would not be opposed to a coaching change at the end of the season. Philbin should be coaching TE's somewhere.