Help Me Tannehill Supporters | Page 5 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Help Me Tannehill Supporters

andyahs said:
That's not the reason the op was mocked. You clearly missed that.

It's useless for supporters of Tannehill to say why they want him to succeed and why they believe in him because posters like you cannot wait for him to fail so you can run to Finheaven and post it.

Tannehill has my support as long as he is a Fin. Learn to deal with it.

Sent from my Nexus 7 FHD
Click to expand...

You can support whatever and whoever you want, but hopefully most of us support the Dolphins as a team, and not a particular player. I'll say it another way - I "support" Tannehill as long as he is the starting QB, because I want my team to win. If the brain trust makes Matt Moore the starter, then I again become a Matt Moore fan. This discussion is not "support" or "non-support", as much as some people love to be dramatic (and I'd like to know the age of some who love hurl insults), it's just discussion.
 
Fins1971 said:
I have seen that several times.
Click to expand...


Sometimes it is Tannehill hesitating. Sometimes he is avoiding pressure. Sometimes it is poor play design. I'm sure that sometimes, the route is run wrong. If it is a stop and go and the WR is lazy on his stop, the timing is off. At those speeds, it doesn't take much.

There isn't any one thing. That is why it is so hard to fix.
 
Wallace17Miami said:
In what way does he have abilities of a big time QB. It's not in arm strength, I guess he has the height?

Struggling in a new offense shouldn't cause you to suddenly become inaccurate.... he's been inaccurate. ESPECIALLY on the deep ball.

I agree with atleast if Tannehill falls flat on his face we atleast get a high draft pick out of it.
Click to expand...

Umm...guy has a big time arm, I don't know what you're watching that you'd come to that conclusion.

Struggling in a new offense can cause a lot of things...including inaccuracy. Can see you don't know the game that well. Depth of routes, timing and chemistry, all affected by running a new offense and getting in sync. Not that complicating. His deep ball is an issue, and I've got concerns that he'll ever be not bad at it. Maybe if your boy Wallace went up for some more balls he'd have better stats, but his deep ball is certainly lacking.
 
FinfanInBuffalo said:
Then why would you say ALL?

Many of the under throws should still have been caught. Similar plays are made all the time... FACT.
Click to expand...


If he's the elite QB you all think... he shouldn't have SO MANY UNDER THROWS!! Those similar plays are made for QB's that usually don't miss their targets and the WR bails them out when they occasionally do.... FACT.
Play the semantics game when you have lost the argument. That's what all of you tannehill supporters do. You all think that us anti tannehill people think he is the only reason we lose. He isn't.... he's just the biggest.

---------- Post added at 03:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:53 PM ----------
FearTheBeard said:
Umm...guy has a big time arm, I don't know what you're watching that you'd come to that conclusion.

Struggling in a new offense can cause a lot of things...including inaccuracy. Can see you don't know the game that well. Depth of routes, timing and chemistry, all affected by running a new offense and getting in sync. Not that complicating. His deep ball is an issue, and I've got concerns that he'll ever be not bad at it. Maybe if your boy Wallace went up for some more balls he'd have better stats, but his deep ball is certainly lacking.
Click to expand...



HAHAHAHAHAHA. best excuse I've heard in a while.

Schemes don't affect accuracy. You are either accurate.... or you are not. It's a QB trait based on mechanics. Schemes affect how well an offense will move based on the players understanding of the scheme. But is no way does it affect accuracy. hahahahah classic
 
slk018 said:
Why are u bringing up Matt Ryan?
If you think Ryan Tannehill is anywhere near Matt Ryan you simply don't understand football. You should stick to World of warcraft or whatever the hot game is nowadays
Click to expand...

Really!?

Year #2 588 355 60.4 36.8 3,913 6.7 244.6 24 4.1 17 81.7
Year #1 484 282 58.3 30.2 3,294 6.8 205.9 12 2.5 13 76.1

Year #2 451 263 58.3 32.2 2,916 6.5 208.3 22 4.9 14 80.9
Year #1 434 265 61.1 27.1 3,440 7.9 215.0 16 3.7 11 87.7

Care to tell me which QB is which?
 
FinfanInBuffalo said:
IMO, there was nothing wrong with the play call or the decision to throw on that play. There were three breakdowns in execution. First, the pass protection allowed quick pressure. Second, Wallace ran a crappy route and got bumped out of bounds. Third, the throw was off target. I don't know if the throw was off target because Tannehill saw Wallace to out of bounds or if it was just a poor throw. Either way, once Wallace goes out of bounds, it can't be completed. IMO, that was exactly the time to take a shot.

The bigger issue (for me) was the play that followed it. Again, there were a couple of issues. First Tannehill takes too long to check down to Thomas in the flat. Second, it looks to me like Tannehill is going to go there but inexplicably Thomas turns away from the QB and turns more up field. I watched the all-22 on that play and it looked to me like Tannehill was going to throw it to Thomas just as he turns away. If Thomas continues to the left flat, he is open for the first down.

So, on those two plays, I agree, running may have picked up the first down, but 2nd and 1 is a great time to take a shot, especially when there is single coverage. 3rd and 1, was an easy throw until Thomas turns his back. By that time, it was too late to scramble.
Click to expand...
I think on that play Tannehill should have either run by himself or throw it to a wide open Gibson. Wallace was the worst option on that play.
 
Wallace17Miami said:
I agree with some of your assessment. He HAS made good throws, and he does occasionally make them. However that seems to have become fewer and further between. I also agree that he never seems to get frustrated, which is good, but I think we can find that in a lot of QB's.

And I disagree completely with him stepping up in the pocket, I rarely see him do that.

My main beef with RT is he doesn't extend plays, he is becoming more and more inaccurate, and his pocket awareness is god awful. And seeing regression in those 3 area's is not something we should be seeing in year 3 of a franchise QB. These are things we should start to see improving, and should be at a level that can help us win football games now, which is not the case.

---------- Post added at 03:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:34 PM ----------



Nothing comment. Thanks for making my argument stronger.
Click to expand...
Yes he does. Whenever there is a pocket which is the rare occurrence you're talking about.

This is what's usually referred to as a "pocket":


And this is what Tannehill has to work with:
 
Spiff said:
Yes he does. Whenever there is a pocket which is the rare occurrence you're talking about.

This is what's usually referred to as a "pocket":


And this is what Tannehill has to work with:
Click to expand...

There's been a few times where he will get sacked from behind because he didnt step up.
 
Wallace17Miami said:
Sorry missed your post.
Click to expand...

I'm glad you said that because I was questioning your sanity for a while. :lol:

Wallace17Miami said:
Thanks for finding one....
Click to expand...
There are plenty of them.

Wallace17Miami said:
Too bad none of those people could venture in here and offer some input as to what they see in Tannehill like the OP asked. Seems like not many people see anything in him if we have to dig around threads to find one more two comments.
Click to expand...
Eh... like I said, the OP had his choice of RT threads to find the same thing. RT has plenty of defenders here still. The OP was just too lazy to read and for that he deserves whatever mockery comes his way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom