If he'd step up most cases he would step right into the defender.There's been a few times where he will get sacked from behind because he didnt step up.
If he'd step up most cases he would step right into the defender.There's been a few times where he will get sacked from behind because he didnt step up.
Then why are most of his long passes short?
If he's the elite QB you all think... he shouldn't have SO MANY UNDER THROWS!! Those similar plays are made for QB's that usually don't miss their targets and the WR bails them out when they occasionally do.... FACT.
Play the semantics game when you have lost the argument. That's what all of you tannehill supporters do. You all think that us anti tannehill people think he is the only reason we lose. He isn't.... he's just the biggest.
---------- Post added at 03:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:53 PM ----------
HAHAHAHAHAHA. best excuse I've heard in a while.
Schemes don't affect accuracy. You are either accurate.... or you are not. It's a QB trait based on mechanics. Schemes affect how well an offense will move based on the players understanding of the scheme. But is no way does it affect accuracy. hahahahah classic
Defeated.... BOOM
I didn't think so.
But I'll show you one anyway.
2nd post in this thread:
http://www.finheaven.com/showthread.php?358027-Why-Not-Rol-Thill-Out&p=1065172061#post1065172061
There you go. Someone saying what they like about RT in a thread about RT. The OP can find what he wants all over the place. He's just too lazy to read the threads that are already there.
Tannehill is the subject of a network experiment. Every time he appears on screen there is a flashing subliminal message, encouraging happy adjustment.
This is a question, and not a comment. Not living in South Florida, I have only had the chance to watch Tanny a handful of times. When I have, I've seen consistent inaccuracy with throws, especially the deep ball (a shame when Wallace runs past the defender), and no indication that he's figured out the mental part of the game. So, what is it about Tannehill that would cause anyone to believe that he might be better in the future? In what way is he better than Matt Moore?
Tannehill is on pace for career-lows in completion percentage (56.5), passer rating (74.1) and yards per attempt (5.0).
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nfl/miami-dolphins/article2195072.html#storylink=cpy
join vip, if you truly want a good perspective on tannehill. there's a great, level-headed, thread about Ryan Tannehill in the VIP section.
How many ways are there to defend crap?