Help Me Tannehill Supporters | Page 6 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Help Me Tannehill Supporters

Then why are most of his long passes short?

Because he isn't throwing it far enough....plain and simple. Theres a big difference though between not throwing it right, and not being able to throw far enough. There are very few QB's in the league that can out-throw RT when it comes to arm strength.
 
If he's the elite QB you all think... he shouldn't have SO MANY UNDER THROWS!! Those similar plays are made for QB's that usually don't miss their targets and the WR bails them out when they occasionally do.... FACT.
Play the semantics game when you have lost the argument. That's what all of you tannehill supporters do. You all think that us anti tannehill people think he is the only reason we lose. He isn't.... he's just the biggest.

---------- Post added at 03:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:53 PM ----------





HAHAHAHAHAHA. best excuse I've heard in a while.

Schemes don't affect accuracy. You are either accurate.... or you are not. It's a QB trait based on mechanics. Schemes affect how well an offense will move based on the players understanding of the scheme. But is no way does it affect accuracy. hahahahah classic

It affects timing...what are you talking about. Scheme, new offense whatever you wanna call it, the whole team is making an adjustment. You could see last week his ball placement improved. Clearly you're not understanding what I'm saying...he will appear more inaccurate when guys aren't where they're supposed to be and he's throwing to a spot.
 
1z39o9i-1.jpg
 
I didn't think so.

But I'll show you one anyway.
2nd post in this thread:
http://www.finheaven.com/showthread.php?358027-Why-Not-Rol-Thill-Out&p=1065172061#post1065172061



There you go. Someone saying what they like about RT in a thread about RT. The OP can find what he wants all over the place. He's just too lazy to read the threads that are already there.

Thanks for directing us to that thread. Interestingly, your contribution to the thread was to slam Tannehill for poor vision and not seeing a sack coming at him.
 
Tannehill is the subject of a network experiment. Every time he appears on screen there is a flashing subliminal message, encouraging happy adjustment.
 
Tannehill is the subject of a network experiment. Every time he appears on screen there is a flashing subliminal message, encouraging happy adjustment.

Get ready for the London-related adjustment. LOL
 
This is a question, and not a comment. Not living in South Florida, I have only had the chance to watch Tanny a handful of times. When I have, I've seen consistent inaccuracy with throws, especially the deep ball (a shame when Wallace runs past the defender), and no indication that he's figured out the mental part of the game. So, what is it about Tannehill that would cause anyone to believe that he might be better in the future? In what way is he better than Matt Moore?

join vip, if you truly want a good perspective on tannehill. there's a great, level-headed, thread about Ryan Tannehill in the VIP section.
 
join vip, if you truly want a good perspective on tannehill. there's a great, level-headed, thread about Ryan Tannehill in the VIP section.

How many ways are there to defend crap?

What's with the excuse making for Tannehill?

Either a QB has it or doesn't it and in year 3, he is regressing to a point where it's quite pathetic.

That's what we get for drafting a QB who has only played the position for a few years and not his whole life.
 
Tannehill's inaccurate ball placement is the reason why Miami had so many injured receivers last year.
 
Back
Top Bottom