From the SI article:
---------
Bengals cornerback Adam “Pacman” Jones was the last player suspended for assault back in 2017. Jones received a one-game suspension for an altercation at a downtown hotel, which ended with him kicking and head-butting officers.
In a letter to Jones, the NFL said it considered the “extensive video documentation of the tone, tenor and nature of your interactions with law enforcement at the site of your arrest, during transportation to the jail, and during the booking process. As you acknowledged, your post-arrest words and actions reflected poorly on you and your family, the Cincinnati Bengals football club, and the NFL.”
----------
Have to say that if the NFL is looking at precedent, a one game suspension for kicking and head butting officers received one game.....a slap to a boat captain would be what, three plays? Even if the NFL wanted to up their toughness to these kind of issues, they've need to do so through a new CBA -- because precedent has been set. Heavy suspenions have been doled out in cases of domestic abuse or sexual assault, but the precedents for straight forward assault -- even ones much heavier than Hill's -- have been light.
Now, the NFL may try to go the route of saying 'Hill is a repeat offender because of the domestic case in Kansas City' which I think is one they would lose drastically in arbitration because the NFL did not punish Hill in that case. I think the NFL's previous inaction in cases will work against them if they try to toughen up -- it certainly did in the Deshaun Watson case and while many of us felt the arbiter's decision was too lenient, the arbiter rules by looking at past precedent.