ckparrothead said:Contrary to popular belief you don't get any points just for putting your name on there.
But a 6 is bad. Very bad. On the SAT you get 400 points just for putting your name on the test, so scoring a 6 on the wonderlic I like to say is equivalent to scoring a 500 on the SAT.
Flyer22 said:Young should have been more prepared. If a player can run the 40 more than once, though, why can't he take the Wonderlic test more than once?
I'm just saying that there are factors that could alter each and warrant a retake. Before I go further, can any player retest or did Young get a special exemption from the NFL? If it's the latter, then I agree that he shouldn't be allowed to retake the test.SpeedRush99 said:Completely different, physical test vs. mental test.
Flyer22 said:I'm just saying that there are factors that could alter each and warrant a retake. Before I go further, can any player retest or did Young get a special exemption from the NFL? If it's the latter, then I agree that he shouldn't be allowed to retake the test.
Thanks anyway, I'll try to look it up. I just didn't want to start a debate and then find out we were in agreement :DSpeedRush99 said:Not sure.
All the players should get one shot only IMO. If the test is designed to measure compentency than their shouldn't be a need for any second thoughts.
Dolfan4life! said:I don't know about that. If so, and it's multiple choice, 12 out of 50 (25%) is what would expected if one answered "c" (or "a". "b", or "d") all the way down the page.
daniel3 said:I'm pretty sure a door knob can't fill out a scantron, so its quite a bit higher.
daniel3 said:He never got a 6 in the first test anyway, why are some still ignoring this?