Well I was talking about franchise accumplishments, never really said anything about recent SB success, but Miami went to the playoffs in the 70s, 80s, 90s, and 00, so they have been at least a bit competitive since 85.
Dunno if this still holds up. Better comparison would be winning percentage since 1966, anyways. I would imagine the Steelers, Cowboys, Broncos, Niners, and Patriots might be higher than the Dolphins if we only go back to 1966.
I do, as of last year, we were 1st or at worst 2 or 3rd. I read an article about the winning % of team in the NFL. You do know that the Steelers were pretty bad until the 70s, right? Or that the Broncos have had far more sub losing season (5 wins or less) then the Dolphins. After Miami losing 10 games this season, I a very sure teams that were close to the Dolphins Like the 49ers and Cowboys, are ahead, and there may be a few more teams.
Nope, that would go to Belichick/Brady
1st off, I said arguably, and number two, the combination of Shula/Marino have won more games then the combination of Belichick/Brady, and they did it without a defense and running game...two things Belichick/Brady had. Oh and as far as SB, Marino/Shula were also not fortunate enough to have the greatest pressure FG kicker ever, or any real elite receivers for that matter that have been there for Belichick/Brady.
Whoa, we had Mike Webster?
Obviously you did not know that the Dolphins had a Center by the name of Dwight Stephenson, and obviously you did not know that for the last 20 years there have been debates between experts (NON-DOLPHIN fans) on who is considered the greatest between Webster and Stephenson. Webster had a longer career, but Stephenson had a shorter but more dominating career. Also, that would again be the reason I wrote
Arguably.
Anyway, sorry I ruined your day with Dolphin accumplishments as a team.