How Many Wins in 2013 was Ryan Tannehill Responsible for?
- Thread starter Shouright
- Start date
Gravity = Ray Finkle?
OP, you seriously gotta stop with these threads! These Tannehill stat pie chart graphs are overloading Finheaven and causing it to crash!
where did I say the OL was above average? I said they were much better than you guys think and they played really well the 2nd half of the season. the fact that you guys trusted Ryan to throw that much is why you didn't make it, that's not on the OL.
yards are meaningless w/o points and you didn't score enough. Ryan's #s LOOKED much better than he actually played.
Um,we were number one in the red zone like the first half of the season.All while we had the worse Oline in the first half of the season.Ryans numbers didn't look good, They were good!:up:
At least Sanchez played as crappy as his #s looked.
wow that is impressive! it must have been the OL's fault that he failed vs. bal to tie despite the D scoring a late TD, throwing as RZ INT vs. Buf then fumbling to set up GW FG then failing to get it back- all OL's fault. It was also the OL's fault when the D scored a TD in an OT game then recorded a safety for the win, also must have bee OL's fault when he threw that pick 6 at Pitt and when leading the O to 7 pts COMBINED against 2 ,mediocre/bad team to end the year needing just 1 win to make the playoffs. It was all the OLs fault!
---------- Post added at 12:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:39 PM ----------
In 2012? he may have been worse than the bad #s but no QB would have succeeded under those circumstances. He didn't have the weapons Ryan had in 2012- when he did he was helping us reach title games.
In 2009-2012.
If he had ANY real chance at being a decent QB, his team would not have flushed him down the drain. Either Sanchez sucks or your beloved team sucks at evaluating talent. Which is it? Let's hear your conspiracy theory.
2009- good year for a rookie
2010- top 10ish
2011-mid of the pack
overall good for those 3 years though.
he wasn't flushed until he got hurt. If the team was desperate to replace him last year they wouldn't have waited until their 3rd pick to take a QB. if Mark was healthy he obviously would have been our starter and would be here going forward but he got hurt, has a high salary and will be released. Another team will benefit from that.
Let me guess why you say that. Is it because he led a game-winning drive in the ATL and NE games?
that is part of it. what were the other games you won b/c of his stellar play?
Phinatic8u
Club Member
Why does every thread that junc enters turns into a pissing match over qbs.
Holy **** people, stop talking to him about Sanchez, stop being the FIRST ****ing dude to bring it up.
Just. Stop. It.
Holy **** people, stop talking to him about Sanchez, stop being the FIRST ****ing dude to bring it up.
Just. Stop. It.
You've already dismissed the game vs. Pittsburgh with your multitude of excuses. The only game I'd say the defense won was vs. Cincy. They literally won the game on a safety. Aside from the disaster in Buffalo, the Cincy game was the only game all year where Tannehill didn't throw a TD.
I don't look at a QB as being the sole reason a team wins. You discredit Tannehill because Daniel Thomas had a long run. Or because a team's defense sucks.
I actually watched what was taking place in the games. So, my eyes.
and for the love of God please don't come back with some nonsense dribble about how non objective it is to go by what you see happening in the games. Coaches, scouts and GM's WATCH TAPE on players for a reason. They don't draft and sign players only off of what they see on a sheet of paper and they certainly know more than you do. They watch and evaluate on "why" things happen.
Your stats are for the media to make things sound interesting.
Your stats are for the media to make things sound interesting.