I Can Now Say The Dolphins Do Not Have A QB. | Page 4 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

I Can Now Say The Dolphins Do Not Have A QB.

Tannehill had a nice second half but if you don't see the difference in the two halves I don't know what to say.

Hartline and Wallace deserve a lot of credit for that. Just saying.
 
I have always said Ryan Tannehill is a below average QB. But he has gotten from bad to worse. He is becoming very irritating to watch. Rich Gannon sounds irritated by him too. I am confident that when the new HC comes in we will have a new QB as well.

I remember when I watched my first football game.
 
So WRs finally get YAC and you say this?

WRs are supposed to get YAC, if that's the case a lot of qbs shouldn't get credit.

Fail.

My point didn't really have much to do with YAC per se, but you can try and redirect that conversation if you want. The 2nd TD pass was all Wallace, because that ball was overthrown (high). Even Tannehill defenders and those on the fence can admit that the receivers helped him pad his stats.
 
Tannehill had a nice second half but if you don't see the difference in the two halves I don't know what to say.

Everyone sees the difference genius. The problem is the haters thinking that a 2nd yr qb has no chance in improving, even though he is continuing to improve! And if YOU can't see that then youre blindly just hating on him bc he plays for the phins. Is that the fan you ate?
 
Hartline and Wallace deserve a lot of credit for that. Just saying.

I agree they do... But then again a lot of qbs actually get help from their receiver when it comes to YAC. Where do rank in YAC again?

---------- Post added at 04:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:15 PM ----------

Lol wow
 
My point didn't really have much to do with YAC per se, but you can try and redirect that conversation if you want. The 2nd TD pass was all Wallace, because that ball was overthrown (high). Even Tannehill defenders and those on the fence can admit that the receivers helped him pad his stats.

Every damn WR pads qb stats..

The **** you talking about

:lol:
 
Every damn WR pads qb stats..

The **** you talking about

Or is it the reverse in which good QBs pad WRs stats? Top 10 QBs aren't that way because of their WRs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just think it's funny how some people on this board wanted Geno Smith instead of Tannehill. It just amazes me how people always thinks it's greener on the other side.
 
My point didn't really have much to do with YAC per se, but you can try and redirect that conversation if you want. The 2nd TD pass was all Wallace, because that ball was overthrown (high). Even Tannehill defenders and those on the fence can admit that the receivers helped him pad his stats.

That was the most preposterous combination of drivel I have ever read
 
Tannehill had a nice second half but if you don't see the difference in the two halves I don't know what to say.

Watch the Pats game later and tell me how bad Brady sucked the 1st half then changed in the 2nd. Guess what it happens? 331 yards 2 tds and 95 QB rating. Terrible. Did he miss some throws, yes. Still played very well
 
4u72hf-1.jpg
 
My point didn't really have much to do with YAC per se, but you can try and redirect that conversation if you want. The 2nd TD pass was all Wallace, because that ball was overthrown (high). Even Tannehill defenders and those on the fence can admit that the receivers helped him pad his stats.

That pass was a hot read and a great job by Tannehill of recognizing that the defense was ten yards off and getting the ball to Wallace right away with time to make the defenders miss. It was just as good of a pass/read as it was a catch and run, and Wallace actually almost screwed it up by not really anticipating the throw all that much.

With a slower receiver, that pass probably wasn't a TD, but don't take it away from Tannehill that he recognized the defense right away and got the ball in the hands of a guy he knows can take it to the house.
 
Back
Top Bottom