I Can Now Say The Dolphins Do Not Have A QB. | Page 13 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

I Can Now Say The Dolphins Do Not Have A QB.

IM Sorry that i have to diagree with you , Tannehill needs just 3 TDs to break the 20 TD mark , and with a OL that has been bringing or rotating players about every other game , i think Tannehill has become a warrior , because you have to have trust in your OL to drop back and NOT WORRIE about getting planted into the dirt , and by rotating the OL like we have i just cant see how Tannehill can even be doing as good as he has ,AND as far as getting another QB , Yeah maybe in about 12 years , because we have our Franchise QB AND he will only get better s the OL gose ..
I could be wrong. But when I see Tannehill, I see his ceiling as a Matt Hasselbeck-Steve Grogan type. I don't see the "franchise QB" that you guys see.
 
The argument that Andrew Luck has his team at 8-4 only because he plays in a soft division FLIES out of the window when you stop and consider that so far this season the Colts have defeated the Broncos, 9ers, and are the only team to have defeated the Seahawks. The Colts have played 3 of the very best teams in the league and beaten them. To say they only have a good record because of their schedule seems silly.

Fact is, the Colts have no OL, no run game, their best WR is injured, and their D is not very good. Andrew Luck has CARRIED that team to a solid 8-4 mark. But, if you want to just look at individual stats and decide another QB is just as good or better than Luck then you are welcome to. I say the reason the Colts are going to win their division and go to the playoffs is because Andrew Luck is a beast and he simply dosent turn the football over like some QBs we know despite having much less to work with.
And that is what I call a FRANCHISE QB!!! He has to be able to pick up the team and will it to victories even when his best weapons are not available. Luck has now proven that.
 
Pathetic thread, and it deserves 1 star. I am so glad none of you are running this organization. I cannot believe he mentioned Rich Gannon as getting fed up with him. lol.... Lost all credibility with this thread.
 
The argument that Andrew Luck has his team at 8-4 only because he plays in a soft division FLIES out of the window when you stop and consider that so far this season the Colts have defeated the Broncos, 9ers, and are the only team to have defeated the Seahawks. The Colts have played 3 of the very best teams in the league and beaten them. To say they only have a good record because of their schedule seems silly.

Fact is, the Colts have no OL, no run game, their best WR is injured, and their D is not very good. Andrew Luck has CARRIED that team to a solid 8-4 mark. But, if you want to just look at individual stats and decide another QB is just as good or better than Luck then you are welcome to. I say the reason the Colts are going to win their division and go to the playoffs is because Andrew Luck is a beast and he simply dosent turn the football over like some QBs we know despite having much less to work with.
Hmmm I guess someone doesn't even bother fact checking before they open their mouth to let the garbage out.

Tannehill turnovers 26 (ints 2012 + 2013) +17 (fumbles 2012 +2013) = 43 turnovers

Luck turnovers 26 (ints 2012 + 2013) + 15 (fumbles 2012 + 2013) = 41 turnovers
 
Hmmm I guess someone doesn't even bother fact checking before they open their mouth to let the garbage out.

Tannehill turnovers 26 (ints 2012 + 2013) +17 (fumbles 2012 +2013) = 43 turnovers

Luck turnovers 26 (ints 2012 + 2013) + 15 (fumbles 2012 + 2013) = 41 turnovers

wrecked
 
Hmmm I guess someone doesn't even bother fact checking before they open their mouth to let the garbage out.

Tannehill turnovers 26 (ints 2012 + 2013) +17 (fumbles 2012 +2013) = 43 turnovers

Luck turnovers 26 (ints 2012 + 2013) + 15 (fumbles 2012 + 2013) = 41 turnovers

That argument is over. On to the next.
 
Hmmm I guess someone doesn't even bother fact checking before they open their mouth to let the garbage out.

Tannehill turnovers 26 (ints 2012 + 2013) +17 (fumbles 2012 +2013) = 43 turnovers

Luck turnovers 26 (ints 2012 + 2013) + 15 (fumbles 2012 + 2013) = 41 turnovers

This does not surprise me at about WVDolphan. He is a Dolphins QB hater. No matter who it is, he will bash and bash. Granted he had a reason with the other QB's but his Tannehill hate is baseless.
 
Not sure what you're intending. It shouldn't be unreasonable to have someone backup their opinion on here.

I agree, but some will not backup their opinion, some just make statements, and just let it stand on just that.
 
I agree, but some will not backup their opinion, some just make statements, and just let it stand on just that.

this is what bothers me to no end. tell me why? stop putting down someone and tell me why?!!! It only makes you look like an institutionalized disgruntled yahoo.
 
And that is what I call a FRANCHISE QB!!! He has to be able to pick up the team and will it to victories even when his best weapons are not available. Luck has now proven that.

To be fair, Luck's performance has gone way downhill over the last few weeks in Reggie Wayne's absence. Still, Luck is the example of a guy who has absolutely nothing to work with on offense or defense and yet his team is in prime position to host a first round playoff game. 8-4 is a solid record, especially considering the entire roster.
 
Interesting no one is making excuses for Russell Wilson, and he's short and has a weak arm.
 
This does not surprise me at about WVDolphan. He is a Dolphins QB hater. No matter who it is, he will bash and bash. Granted he had a reason with the other QB's but his Tannehill hate is baseless.

Not true. I sang Pennington's praises the whole time he was with us as well as the months before we signed him.

In fact, I urged the team to get him if he became available. Even when we started that season 2-4, I thought Pennington was a solid player and an asset to the team.

I also own a Jay Fiedler jersey. I dont own many jerserys. Marino, Zach, and Fiedler is all.
 
its a team game. our team beat lucks team. isnt this what its all about in the end?

anyhoo, if we make it in, it will be nice to play cincy or indy again. I like our chances there should we get there.
 
I have enjoyed reading WVDolphan's posts. Even Bill Cowher said Tannehill was terrible too, against Jets, 1st half.

I want Tannehill to excel and I really believe if Moore or Pat Devlin had played the entire season, we would have made the playoffs.

I hope I am wrong and Tannehill blossoms , but these low scoring games will come back to bite us.
 
I have enjoyed reading WVDolphan's posts. Even Bill Cowher said Tannehill was terrible too, against Jets, 1st half.

I want Tannehill to excel and I really believe if Moore or Pat Devlin had played the entire season, we would have made the playoffs.

I hope I am wrong and Tannehill blossoms , but these low scoring games will come back to bit us.

It's a 60 minute game. How did that 2nd half turn out for you and Billy?
 
Back
Top Bottom