inFINSible
Don't believe everything you think.
That doesn't mean that Rick Speilman knew them any less.BlueFin said:Yes InFinsible, and if you've listened to Nick Saban you've heard how well he knows these players.
That doesn't mean that Rick Speilman knew them any less.BlueFin said:Yes InFinsible, and if you've listened to Nick Saban you've heard how well he knows these players.
tigerskin said:Listening to him talk every week for 5 years. I know the type of players that he likes and Saban knows that his best skill is talent evaluation. He knows it his butt on the line and he trusts his talent evaluation over others'. He also has a little bit of an ego. All the good ones do. He knew these guys could play so why take a chance on more of an unknown. Those guys can play and were good picks for the spot they were taken at so it was a no-brainer for Saban. Saban doesn't take a big risk if it is not necessary. You may say that Crowder is a medical risk, but the medical team OK'd it.
inFINSible said:That doesn't mean that Rick Speilman knew them any less.
BlueFin said:They haven't learned that yet, some feel Rick Spielman is just a victim, both in Chicago and here....none of it was his fault.
It wasn't his fault he broadcast what we were after so that Philly could trade ahead of us to take Andrews in the last draft.
And it wasn't his fault Minnesota abused him like they did by suckering him out of a 4th rounder to move up one spot for a player they nor anybody else had any intention of drafting that would have lasted until the late first or early second if we hadn't drafted him. a PROBLEM ALSO CAUSED BY HIS STUPIDITY IN BROADCASTING WHO WE WANTED.
Nope Tigerskin, to some of these former devotees of Dave Wannstedt Rick Spielman is Nick Sabans....Scot Pioli......there going to find out real quick hes not.
BlueFin said:Doesn't matter does it? Rick has been stripped of power
BlueFin said:Doesn't matter does it? Rick has been stripped of power, after his moronic year as a GM he isn't likely to get the keys anywhere else.
This is Nick Sabans ship, and all credit ultimately goes to him.
inFINSible said:Then who ultimately gets all the blame when this was Dave Wannstedt's ship?
*sniff sniff* is that double standards I smell?
What about Chicago? That would be 9 years on Dave and 1 on Speilman.BlueFin said:Four years of blame on Wannstedt, one year on Spielman....
inFINSible said:What about Chicago? That would be 9 years on Dave and 1 on Speilman.
One year under the most horrendous conditions that any Captain of the ship has ever had to endure in Miami.
Yeah, let's crucify him based on that. That's fair.
BlueFin said:Last year was enough for me....................
inFINSible said:Since his moves as a GM mean nothing to his role now, what exactly about his talent evaluation skills, last year, makes you think he is worthless?
BlueFin said:I think it would be his talent evaluation skills..............![]()
inFINSible said:What's the point?? :rolleyes2
Would you rather I start a..."Who's your Favorite Dolphin player"...thread?
islandah said:As entertaining as it's been, I think you actually completely missed the point of the thread, which was not "does Spielman deserve credit for the pick," but rather, "if he was given credit for the pick, would that change your opinion of it?" In other words, are you so knee-jerk biased against Spielman that his involvement in the pick would significantly alter your opinion of it? Your denial of his possible involvement tells me that 1.You think it's a good pick, and 2. You can't allow yourself to believe that Spielman had any significant involvement, due to you're subjective bias.
The quote that Saban picked the first four picks due to his personal involvement with little help from the scouts is naive, considering that Saban said from the beginning that he wanted a system in place to evaluate, grade and pick talent. Of course RS had a hand in it, as well as numerous other scouts, coaches, etc. And of course it was Saban's final call.
InFins just wanted to have an intelligent debate regarding your bias towards RS and when it became clear there was no further intelligent debate to be had, he lost interest. I think he started the thread to see who would take the bait - apparently he hooked a tuna.
inFINSible said:Great post up until that last line....I would never do anything like that....:whistle: