Moore was in for 6 plays in that game. he threw 2 INT's and fumbled once
Which makes it all the more funny that despite that, he was the better of the two Dolphins QB's that day.
Moore was in for 6 plays in that game. he threw 2 INT's and fumbled once
With that said, is this still true in your quote concerning Moore.
After starting the season 0-2 the Panthers thought they had Matt Moore as QB, but after throwing 4 ints and sacked 8 times in 2 games it's clear Moore isn't at the level the panthers are suspecting and wanting him to be at.
Nothing "tough guy" about it. Just didn't want an infraction for what I really had to say. Especially since I took the time to spell it out for you (not a copy and paste) and all you had in return was the 3 generic drivils that you've clung to for this entire thread.
Please insert the name Ryan Tannehill into that story and tell me you wouldn't be barking for PATIENCE! GIVE THE GUY A CHANCE!
You won't though. That was a disaster season on all levels and to judge Moore ONLY on it after he was concussed in game one and was having to split games with Clausen, THEN tearing his labrum. C'mon bruh.
Even if you want to dog him for that train wreck of a year the Panthers had, he still came in and did something with this Dolphins offense that it hasn't seen in a decade (vs. bad or good teams).
"After starting the season 0-2 the Panthers thought they had Matt Moore as QB, but after throwing 4 ints and sacked 8 times in 2 games it's clear Moore isn't at the level the panthers are suspecting and wanting him to be at.
."
Good for you bud. You get so heated you have to cuss people out on the internetz. :3w:
Your drive recap explained nothing when it came to Tannehill's failure to put TD's up vs. the leagues worst offense in the dress rehearsal.
He took a concussion in game 1. I'm sure that had absolutely nothing to do with the rough start.
I'm sure the team trainers said he was "fine" and they should know, right?
Which makes it all the more funny that despite that, he was the better of the two Dolphins QB's that day.
Moore completed as many to Buffalo as he did Miami; not better...Which makes it all the more funny that despite that, he was the better of the two Dolphins QB's that day.
What part of him enduring 36 sacks and a myriad of hurries in 12 games in 2010 didn't you understand? Did you again miss the fact that his O-line was substandard like Tanny's, particularly with Colombo as his RT? :idk:
This is one of those things where guys are reading stat lines, which they tell fans not to fixate on when it comes to Tanny.
Anyone who followed that Carolina team closely in 2010 knew what a disaster it became.
I get it context for Moore is ok, but not Tannehill.