gofins60
Club Member
First, to concede to your point, I admit that I sometimes make a post and then when confronted, realize that maybe I overlooked or was ignorant about something and have to re-explain myself. However, in my defense, there are times when the poster attacking my opinion is doing so only because they disagree with me, and it's tough trying to be rational and civilized when faced with someone who won't consider the fact that there's nothing wrong with having an opposing opinion, as everyone sees similar things from different perspectives.That's some "elite" level rationalization BS you have going on there, brother.
Your recent posts are all over the place with contradictory statements, backtracking, piece meal arguments that don't align cohesively, etc.
You may be better off just saying you don't like Ross, Grier, McD or Tua and leave it at that, rather than attempting to expound on the specifics of why.
And, yes, it would be so much simpler to just say that I don't like Ross, Grier, McDaniel, and Tua, and leave it at that. But, there are those here who resort to juvenile name-calling and personal attacks to anyone who disagrees with them. With most of these people I just ignore them, but with some, they appear to be more "civilized" and so I feel obligated to try to explain my position, which at times might not come out as clear and rational as I'd like it to be.
