The Eagles were essentially the #1 defense last year and they had the NFL's best rusher who ran for 2,000 yards in 16 games with a nearly 6.0 ypc average.
Jalen Hurts, who almost never threw across the middle of the field (look at the heat maps), passed for 2,900 yards in 15 games with 18 TDs and 5 INTs.
On top of that production, Hurts ran for 600 yards which is certainly good but not "wow" kind of stuff.
Is Jalen Hurts elite? I don't know any serious person who'd say yes although he's certainly a feature of a dominant team not unlike how say, Russell Wilson once was in Seattle.
What happened with Russ after the LoB defense was dismantled kind of speaks for itself. The dynasty collapsed and Russ became a hired gun dancing from Denver to Pittsburgh to the NYG on short stints to solidified the NFL's understanding that he was a limited QB who needed a great team around him capable of carrying him just as much as he lifted it.
Does that erase what he did in Seattle? No, but it does shine light on how over-rated he probably was when he was labeled as one of the elite QBs in the NFL alongside guys like Aaron Rodgers in GB who basically were the offense where they played.
Just as Russ' team beat Peyton Manning's in the Super Bowl, Hurts' beat Mahomes and the Chiefs. Did the better QB win? No, but that's interesting as well.
Ranking QBs is just fun to do so we do it. In reality, you work around who you have and upgrade when you feel you need to. When the Eagles fall apart, most would probably agree that Hurts won't be enough to sustain them into the next dynasty. His short-comings as a full-time passer will become the focus of criticism and his pricetag will make him the enemy in Philadelphia.