Not everyone will be pleased about the same topic. It's an infinite impossibility. There will always be something wrong in at least one person's eyes and that's just the way it is
If the only thing you had with the Browns is Hillis and a pretty good young o-line wouldn't you run the ball? I mean who were there Receivers? TEs? QBs? McCoy didn't look too bad but really who did they have? Stuckey, Cribbs, Engram, Moore Massaquoi. They all suck. He had Hillis, leading rusher and 2nd leading receiver on that team.
Now he has a Bush, Marshall, Bess, Fasano, Hartline, and Thomas to work with. Lets see what he does here before you no what he does. Good coaches change their philosopy to what their strengths are. LEts see what he does.
---------- Post added at 02:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:57 PM ----------
You can have the same philosopy and excute it better. You can be a smash mouth team and still throw. Look at the 90's Cowboys.
[/B]
It's not the 90's anymore...It’s a pass happy league and were stuck with run conservative offense we have. It’s not like Cleveland didn’t have any talent you forgot to mention Ben Watson who is better than Fasano. **** the awful Washington Redskins had the 18th overall offense with a crap team at least that is in the middle of the pack.