Keep Matt Moore or Draft Weeden or Tannehill | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Keep Matt Moore or Draft Weeden or Tannehill

What QB do you want for next year

  • Keep Matt Moore build around him

    Votes: 43 46.2%

  • Weeden in round 1

    Votes: 1 1.1%

  • Weeden in round 2

    Votes: 24 25.8%

  • Tanehill in round 1

    Votes: 10 10.8%

  • Tanehill in round 2

    Votes: 15 16.1%
  • Total voters
    93
  • Poll closed .
i dont understand this "OR" thing.

we have NO depth at qb. unless you believe the buffalo cast off [whats his name, mr. deeds?] is the answer.

so we HAVE TO DRAFT a qb, weather we have moore or not. and if this thing is handled right, henne is as far away from this team as an airplane can take him. but tannehil [who i love] or weeden shouldnt even be a thought at #8 or #9. tannehill wont last past the 3rd round so if we want him, we will have to pull the trigger than. its just how the qb is weather you think those two are worth those spots or not.

i would LOVE to draft tannehill as he shows everything you want in an nfl qb. he is young, big, strong, good arm, accurate and a ceiling that rivals the sears tower! if moore doesnt turn out to be the qb i think he is going to be, than tannehill is a great option to groom.

and lets face it, once again, matt moore is a glorified rookie. undrafted, a basic walk on for the boys that already had a qb rotation in place. it was numbers. ireland and tony new that and thats why they brought him here. in carolina, he had a limited camp and no reps with the starters. got thrown in when there qb got hurt. looked great! team around him didnt. he was injured out the gate the next season and the team was gutted at seasons end becuse they were horrid, along with matt. that just about always happens with new regimes. and how exactly in all that was he supposed to turn into a franchise qb? who could?

so here he comes, less than 2 years of games under his belt, one team he had NO shot at because of numbers and another just wasnt a good enough team for him to make his mark along with an untimely injury.

he comes off the bench here, no time with the starters in a limited camp, maybe the worst o-line in the nfl, play band on his wrist and a team that had no wins and none in sight, a short time head coach and he ended up SHINING!! under those circumstances!!

and people say his ceiling is reached? how? with less than 2 seasons of games and 1 full camp under his belt [as a backup]? hows that?

get this line built, add a real TE and a wr who can get in the endzone and then tell me about matt moores "ceiling!!

we build around a great looking young qb in matt moore and draft the best rookie left on the board which could be tannehill, hopefully.

no "OR" about it.
 
If you want to win now, make a play for Peyton or Flynn. Keep Moore too. After RGIII, there is not enough talent @ QB in the draft. With needs at RT, WR, & OLB there is a ton of talent in this year's draft for those areas.
 
Valandui said:
Draft Tannehill and start Moore until he's ready.
Click to expand...

Best scenario IMO. I like Tannehill and to get him we will need to draft him in the 1st round. However I dont think he is near ready to start straight away. So keep Moore as starter until he is ready to take over.
 
God, they all just seem average...

Tannehill looked bad in his bowl game...

Moore is just average.

Weeden is almost 30...

People's expections have changed...
 
Trade the farm for rg3 and let him and matt moore duel it out. Whoever is most accurate with quickest release gets the job.
 
Trade up for RG3. We've tried and failed to find a QB since the late 90's through so many different ways, like drafting reaches in 2nd round or later, trades, other team's backups, journeymen or failing in free agency.

The one thing we haven't done is take a top QB in the first round. Grow a pair and trade up instead of being afraid that he "might be a bust". Yeah, and he might also be a franchise QB for 15 years. If they don't gamble we'll continue to be a mediocre franchise with a dwindling attendance.

Hopefully the ESPN report that Ireland might be looking to trade with the Rams is true. Ireland did go to Baylor...
 
Weeden's talent is worth a 1st round pick in today's QB market, look at Locker and Ponder.

I don't think his age is a big a factor as it's made out to be. He has a good chance to be a starter right away and if he starts breaking down in his mid 30s let's cross that bridge when we come to it.
 
Ed Norton said:
Weeden's talent is worth a 1st round pick in today's QB market, look at Locker and Ponder.

I don't think his age is a big a factor as it's made out to be. He has a good chance to be a starter right away and if he starts breaking down in his mid 30s let's cross that bridge when we come to it.
Click to expand...

What do Locker and Ponder have to do with Weeden. Locker has always been considered a top talent at qb and will still be 5 years younger than Weeden next NFL season. Its a myth that Weeden is any more ready than any other college qb because of his age, sounds familiar with the people who liked beck praising his maturity. I like Weeden as apossible sleeper but tto throw away a first or second round pick on this guy would be incredibly stupid. Now 4th round comes fire away. So we pass on Mallet in second but the same idiot gm would take Weeden i just dont see it
 
Hell i would say keep moore , keep devlin resign henne cheap and draft a damn qb and look hard at free agency. Cover all damn bases
 
NRA said:
i dont understand this "OR" thing.

we have NO depth at qb. unless you believe the buffalo cast off [whats his name, mr. deeds?] is the answer.

so we HAVE TO DRAFT a qb, weather we have moore or not. and if this thing is handled right, henne is as far away from this team as an airplane can take him. but tannehil [who i love] or weeden shouldnt even be a thought at #8 or #9. tannehill wont last past the 3rd round so if we want him, we will have to pull the trigger than. its just how the qb is weather you think those two are worth those spots or not.

i would LOVE to draft tannehill as he shows everything you want in an nfl qb. he is young, big, strong, good arm, accurate and a ceiling that rivals the sears tower! if moore doesnt turn out to be the qb i think he is going to be, than tannehill is a great option to groom.

and lets face it, once again, matt moore is a glorified rookie. undrafted, a basic walk on for the boys that already had a qb rotation in place. it was numbers. ireland and tony new that and thats why they brought him here. in carolina, he had a limited camp and no reps with the starters. got thrown in when there qb got hurt. looked great! team around him didnt. he was injured out the gate the next season and the team was gutted at seasons end becuse they were horrid, along with matt. that just about always happens with new regimes. and how exactly in all that was he supposed to turn into a franchise qb? who could?

so here he comes, less than 2 years of games under his belt, one team he had NO shot at because of numbers and another just wasnt a good enough team for him to make his mark along with an untimely injury.

he comes off the bench here, no time with the starters in a limited camp, maybe the worst o-line in the nfl, play band on his wrist and a team that had no wins and none in sight, a short time head coach and he ended up SHINING!! under those circumstances!!

and people say his ceiling is reached? how? with less than 2 seasons of games and 1 full camp under his belt [as a backup]? hows that?

get this line built, add a real TE and a wr who can get in the endzone and then tell me about matt moores "ceiling!!

we build around a great looking young qb in matt moore and draft the best rookie left on the board which could be tannehill, hopefully.

no "OR" about it.
Click to expand...

Here's the thing Tanehill isn't orth no where near 9 or 8th 1st round, on top of that he played like crap this bowl game and broke his foot so why waste a 1st round on him and he might not even be there in the 2nd but if he is is draft him, even though weeden has more talent then him he is just to old but the Tanehill hype isn't as loud when he isn't as good as weeden to begin with I don't even think he's better then moore.
 
dlockz said:
Hell i would say keep moore , keep devlin resign henne cheap and draft a damn qb and look hard at free agency. Cover all damn bases
Click to expand...

4 qbs? plus free agency?? You do realize QB isn't the hole we got right? and look at free agency then look at the draft if you wanna waste a 1st round 9 pick on old weeden or one foot tanehill who has less talent then weeden to begin with.
 
NeverForgetDan said:
4 qbs? plus free agency?? You do realize QB isn't the hole we got right? and look at free agency then look at the draft if you wanna waste a 1st round 9 pick on old weeden or one foot tanehill who has less talent then weeden to begin with.
Click to expand...

I never said draft weeden in first. Whether tanney hill has less talent than weeden is an opinion and who knows. RG3 is the only other qb worth taking this early. i said draft a qb not where. I never said spend big money on a free agent qb. Im saying explore all options including trading up
 
If those are the options then stick with Moore. I don't understand how anyone could draft a 28yr old qb in any round. Half his career is over. And Tannehill is a project, now an injured one. If you want a qb early take Foles in the 2nd. If you want a qb late then Russell Wilson or Darron Thomas in the 5th.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom