WaHooFin
Practice Squad
only if Andrews is not there should we look at WR
Given the needs of our O-line, if Andrews is there at 20, I seriously hope that we grab him...
4 reasons:
1) WR is an extremely deep position and we can take another in the later rounds who we can use, and probably will be more adapt to be used, in the slot position
2) we won't rock the boat with Boston and risk upsetting the status quo on who our star WRs are/will be (however, we could if we take a Clayton or Woods in the 1st)
3) Andrews is a mauler of a lineman who we greatly need to open holes for RW to run through (why would we not take him if he's there - especially givent he fact that some think he may go in the top 12)
4) we have a bigger need at OL than at WR (this is at multiple levels)
Of course, if Andrews is gone, depending on who is left on the board in terms of WRs, I say we trade down to get more picks...drop off of quality dictates this...
thoughts!?!?!
Given the needs of our O-line, if Andrews is there at 20, I seriously hope that we grab him...
4 reasons:
1) WR is an extremely deep position and we can take another in the later rounds who we can use, and probably will be more adapt to be used, in the slot position
2) we won't rock the boat with Boston and risk upsetting the status quo on who our star WRs are/will be (however, we could if we take a Clayton or Woods in the 1st)
3) Andrews is a mauler of a lineman who we greatly need to open holes for RW to run through (why would we not take him if he's there - especially givent he fact that some think he may go in the top 12)
4) we have a bigger need at OL than at WR (this is at multiple levels)
Of course, if Andrews is gone, depending on who is left on the board in terms of WRs, I say we trade down to get more picks...drop off of quality dictates this...
thoughts!?!?!