DonShula84
Sporty Don
Chambers isnt Moss your comparison is foolish
Noodleman said:Chambers is a good receiver. He has shown flashes of being a go to guy. The fact is that he has always been in a ball control offense that was hesitant to throw the ball much. It was always hand off 40 times pass only when needed. That being said, IMO, I don't think Chambers has lived up to his potential. He has great games, like the Cowboys, but doesn't show up in alot of games as well. With Linehan, I believe the offense will open up considerably. If Saban wanted to be a ball control offense, he wouldn't hire a cordinator known for opening up the offense.
unifiedtheory said:Both of the recievers you listed (Burleson and Robinson) have done something Chambers never has....gained 1,000 yards recieving.
I like Chambers a lot but I am sick of hearing about "how good he could be if he had a q.b." or "this is his breakout year".
He's getting paid like a #1...it's TIME for him to play like it. He needs to be more consistent in my opinion.
I don't work weekends, but I did take Monday the 25th off to recover :DGen3D said:I haven't been this exicited about draft day ever! I can't wait till the 23rd! I even took the day off just to make sure I don't miss anything that weekend.
Minnphin said:Minnphin
Hisn'WithYour'n said:While I wouldn't mind getting the next Randy Moss and lining him up alongside Chambers, we would still have a huge hole at RB. A position that may or may not be addressed later in the draft.
You're setting up your QB to fail. I don't care if you have Largent, Rice and Warfield as your receivers. It won't mean a thing if defenses don't respect your running game. Unless of course your QB is named Danny Marino. If your QB is named Danny Marino, ignore everything I've said. If not, get a Blue Chip running back.
Hisn'WithYour'n said:If Linehan is worth the money he signed for then we shouldn't need another big time receiver to make his offense work. Just get Chambers to live up to his potential, and we'll have what the Vikings had: One go-to receiver who takes the pressure off the others. Is anyone convinced that Burleson and Robinson are so much better than Booker and Thompson?
fishypete said:Actually your incorrect....teams can't keep 8 or 9 men in the box if you have two or three receivers that can run...get open and catch the football....that makes average running backs look alot better. For the last few season's the Dolphins have been average at receiver at best...even with Chambers. Take Chambers out of the play....and the Dolphins wind up 4-12. A player like Randy Moss made the Vikes offense what it was....made their running game what it was...teams they played against didn't care about the vikes running game....stop Moss and you win. Thats why it's very very important for the Dolphins to select another "Chambers"....you can't double up both of them.
FinFan Brazil said:SORRY but Burleson is MUCH better than Booker...