joeharley666
☠️ Banned ☠️
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2007
- Messages
- 2,094
- Reaction score
- 8
Sure, if we had a great TE and great Running Game, we would be much better. But then, you can probably plug n play ANY QB into that offense. When the offense is lacking in other areas, that's the test of a great QB. Can he compensate? Can he win games for you? Like Cam just did? (And Cam's not even great but he still brought his team back).
Tannehill was off target on several throws, even the ones Wallace caught. After Wallace scord in the first quarter, we should have put the pedal to the metal. Instead, on our next possession, we ran for no yards and Tanny's pass to Rishard Matthews was incomplete, and we punted. On the next one after that, Wallace came up with another huge reception, and we got down to the 20 yard line. Then instead of scoring a TD, the drive died because of yet another incompleted pass to Matthews and more crappy run yardage. Later on, we were down at the 5 yard line, and settled for a FG, because again, we couldn't complete a pass.
What in that did you see was not at least partially, Ryan Tannehill's fault? He throws the passes, makes the reads. He chooses a run or pass play on every down.
We're not watching Madden, we're watching the game!
Really? I didn't say we needed a "great" running game or a "great" TE, we just need a running game and a TE
Thill is fine right now, you can't judge him yet with the little he has to work with. Let's face it, all the "pro analysts" thought he should sit for a few years but in our reality he's a raw QB who is learning on the job without the rest of the offense in front of him or behind him.