ckparrothead
Premium Member
Honestly, we are probably in the best position to get Manning because we have a solid backup who I believe can get us to the playoffs if Manning goes down. At this point, I would assume the risk of signing Manning. He will likely be affordable (because he is damaged goods), so if everything works out for the best, you have a HOF QB leading your team. If all else fails, you have Matt Moore coming back who did a pretty good job winning games last year, but now playing under a better offensive system.
I don't see much of a risk in signing Manning for that reason. He won't be our only option once the season starts. If we were picking higher, I would rather get RGIII than Manning, but considering we can't get to RGIII, Manning will work fine.
Its obvious that the staff doesn't consider Matt Flynn to be a franchise QB, so I don't think its much of a loss if he signs elsewhere.
I don't see how that's obvious in any way.