Jt0323
☠️ Banned ☠️
miamikid92 said:wat are the chances of the marlins moving to nj
im goona say Real Slim
miamikid92 said:wat are the chances of the marlins moving to nj
Jayson Stark said:Q: This deal provides for no contraction through 2006, but says the union can't fight it in 2007. Does that mean contraction is inevitable in 2007?
A: No way. All it means is that the players agreed they won't file any grievances to stop it. That doesn't prevent exactly what happened in Minnesota this year. Leasing authorities, team employees, stadium workers and season-ticket holders can still sue. Local governments can raise a stink. Minor-league franchises can seek restraining orders. Contraction still faces many hurdles beyond just the players' union.
phunwin said:Even though the black letter law of the CBA says they can contract, there are still way too many obstacles to doing so. And even if the union can't officially block it, they can still raise hell and strike. Granted, it would be an illegal strike, but what's Selig going to do, fire them? They're not air traffic controllers, and Selig damn sure ain't Ronald Reagan.
If contraction is a technical possibility (and thanks for noting that, Dudeman; I had assumed the union bargained to keep it out of the owners' hands), it's not a realistic one.
IMHO, here are my odds on the Marlins home for 2007 and beyond...
South Florida 3-1
Las Vegas, NV 7-2
Charlotte, NC 10-1
Portland, OR 10-1
Monterrey, Mexico 15-1
San Juan, PR 50-1
New Jersey 50-1
And just for old time's sake:
Montreal, PQ 1,000,000-1
RWhitney014 said:And Buffalo? 1,00000000000000000000000000,000-1
RWhitney014 said:And Buffalo? 1,00000000000000000000000000,000-1
But I'm going to have to make a minor adjustment. The Marlins will still be here for the 2007 season. The quickest a stadium can be built elsewhere is in time for the 2008 season, but with the glacial pace MLB moves at with these things and the fact that our lease runs through 2010 in Dolphins Stadium, 2006 won't be the last season...and while we're on the topic...
http://www.finheaven.com/cms/244.html
phunwin said:Aw man, that's cold. Major League Baseball screwed over the Nickel City back in 1968, and folks haven't forgotten. Of course, now the combination of lousy weather and a worse economy have made Buffalo's chances of landing a baseball team only marginally better than Anchorage, Alaska's.
phunwin said:Aw man, that's cold. Major League Baseball screwed over the Nickel City back in 1968, and folks haven't forgotten. Of course, now the combination of lousy weather and a worse economy have made Buffalo's chances of landing a baseball team only marginally better than Anchorage, Alaska's.
phunwin said:Aw man, that's cold. Major League Baseball screwed over the Nickel City back in 1968, and folks haven't forgotten. Of course, now the combination of lousy weather and a worse economy have made Buffalo's chances of landing a baseball team only marginally better than Anchorage, Alaska's.
MikeO said:Yes they will probably be there for the 2007 season, but they don't need to wait for a new built stadium to move. They could play a year or two in a converted football stadium or a very large AAA stadium (depending on the city) and be out ASAP.
dob72 said:i'm sure that will make alot of u dolphins only fans happy
RWhitney014 said:Las Vegas obviously doesn't have a football stadium (whatever UNLV uses doesn't count), and Cashman Field not only is too small, but the Dodgers AAA team needs it.
Portland has a small AAA park and no football stadium. Charlotte has the football stadium, but the closest facility is in Durham. Which is also too small. The only open facility was in DC, but that's being used. So unless you're suggesting a short-term move to Montreal, South Florida is definitely the best immediate option.
And they can't move somewhere with the assumption that a park will be built, because, as I said in the article, look at what Washington is going through right now.