Stefins said:Bottom Line is....
We traded Surtain for AJ feeley.
byroan said:No, we traded Surtain for the player that will be picked at #35 tomorrow.
What did O-gun do for the bears last year? I think Booker contributed more to us, don't you?KB21 said:Miami has a nasty habit of undervaluing their own players and basically giving them away in trades. They did it with Ogunleye, and now they have done it again with Surtain.
Stefins said:Bottom Line is....
We traded Surtain for AJ feeley.
Both deals involved the other team's paying a HUGE signing bonus with plenty of guaranteed money, though. You don't get a team to do that AND give up a mega draft pick. We were lucky to get the #2 -- next year we would've gotten nothing. Why do you think there weren't more teams jockeying for Surtain? Why didn't some other team hear about this deal and say, "hey wait! -- we'll give you a #1!"KB21 said:Miami has a nasty habit of undervaluing their own players and basically giving them away in trades. They did it with Ogunleye, and now they have done it again with Surtain.
Marino Forever said:What did O-gun do for the bears last year? I think Booker contributed more to us, don't you?
shouright said:Both deals involved the other team's paying a HUGE signing bonus with plenty of guaranteed money, though. You don't get a team to do that AND give up a mega draft pick. We were lucky to get the #2 -- next year we would've gotten nothing. Why do you think there weren't more teams jockeying for Surtain? Why didn't some other team hear about this deal and say, "hey wait! -- we'll give you a #1!"
But did he get 15 sacks for da Bears? No way. Why- JT wasn't lined up on the other side.KB21 said:I don't think Booker contributed as much as Ogunleye would have. We still haven't replaced his 15 sacks.
KB21 said:Miami has a nasty habit of undervaluing their own players and basically giving them away in trades. They did it with Ogunleye, and now they have done it again with Surtain.
KB21 said:Someone please explain to me how it remotely makes sense that Miami is lucky to get a #2 pick for Patrick Surtain, a top 5 NFL cornerback, when Oakland gets a #2 and a #3 for a nickle back in Philip Buchanon?
A top 5 STARTING cornerback in the NFL vs a NICKLE back?
I'll let Jason Cole explain it -- I don't have time to pull up the link but this is from his Herald Q & A Forum:KB21 said:Someone please explain to me how it remotely makes sense that Miami is lucky to get a #2 pick for Patrick Surtain, a top 5 NFL cornerback, when Oakland gets a #2 and a #3 for a nickle back in Philip Buchanon?
A top 5 STARTING cornerback in the NFL vs a NICKLE back?
Marino Forever said:But did he get 15 sacks for da Bears? No way. Why- JT wasn't lined up on the other side.
We gave him AND his outrageous Drew Rosenhaus-driven contract demands away.KB21 said:But we gave him away for a friggin wide receiver and a third round pick.