Snickersbps
Pro Bowler
yeah, Im with you on that. Reading through it, if I were and "un-biased juror" I would have to say im leaning towards letting him walk.
Merged: The official bystanders that wanna see Dave hang at the trial thread!
- Thread starter ZOD
- Start date
yeah, Im with you on that. Reading through it, if I were and "un-biased juror" I would have to say im leaning towards letting him walk.
Section126
FinHeaven VIP
Well, PM the prosecution....with your suggestions...I am sure he'll be happy to hear from you..............
Snickersbps
Pro Bowler
i never said I had any better ideas :D
thats why I didnt jump at the chance to be defense or the prosecutor, confrontations, arguments and such arent one of my strong suits
thats why I didnt jump at the chance to be defense or the prosecutor, confrontations, arguments and such arent one of my strong suits
Last edited by a moderator:
phins_4_ever
E12 FH Tailgate Gang
wow..wait a minute.....
FFiB facing a;ll odds?
where is Muck?????
Section126
FinHeaven VIP
Anybody is allowed to take sides and inject their two cents.........
I merely pointed out that you can criticize but it would be more constructive to engage them personally.
Well I think that at least one of the charges are redundant.
It is easier to prove one charge than to make 5 stick.
You'd better bring it good and be an exceptional and persuasive lawyer to do something like that....either that or the defense is just sleeping.
Instead of citing cliche' bullet points, I think it would be more meaningful to specify examples of where his coaching style has hurt the team.
Really, that is all this is about because Dave isn't a person with bad habits or one who really does a half *** job of coaching.
....thats 4 cents...
It is easier to prove one charge than to make 5 stick.
You'd better bring it good and be an exceptional and persuasive lawyer to do something like that....either that or the defense is just sleeping.
Instead of citing cliche' bullet points, I think it would be more meaningful to specify examples of where his coaching style has hurt the team.
Really, that is all this is about because Dave isn't a person with bad habits or one who really does a half *** job of coaching.
....thats 4 cents...
Section126
FinHeaven VIP
I just directed him to be constructive....there is no sense in criticizing anyone.
P4E
Cogito, Ergo FinFanum
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2002
- Messages
- 4,090
- Reaction score
- 5
What did you expect in the midst of a trial? :D
You guys can jump PM me when you're ready to post. No need to send it to me and create extra steps. The reason I keep it locked is so no one else posts or messes around in there. It already happened twice when I left it open. Luckily I was in the thread. Plus this makes things clear and concise.
GazPhin
Brannigan Begin Again
Me too...
The prosecutions case is too much about opinion and passion and not enough about facts. No way he get's convicted on the basis of the argument "I believe Wanny sucks".
I'd like to congratulate the defense on the way it has presented a well researched, balanced case proving, apparently, that black is white. Not sure how that looks to those of you watching in colour, but basically as it stands no unbiased jury is going to send the boy Wanny down. (I can't believe that's what we have, but we'll see).
I would have made a case along the same lines.
The prosecutions case is too much about opinion and passion and not enough about facts. No way he get's convicted on the basis of the argument "I believe Wanny sucks".
I'd like to congratulate the defense on the way it has presented a well researched, balanced case proving, apparently, that black is white. Not sure how that looks to those of you watching in colour, but basically as it stands no unbiased jury is going to send the boy Wanny down. (I can't believe that's what we have, but we'll see).
I would have made a case along the same lines.
Phew!
Well finally the prosecution is picking up a little steam. I guess they saved the bomb for later.
Digging into his history as a coach at Chicago is very smart. It presents a consistent basis on a valid arguement.
Now it would be good to show tie ins and comparisons to how he handles his QBs in Chicago and Miami.
Well finally the prosecution is picking up a little steam. I guess they saved the bomb for later.
Digging into his history as a coach at Chicago is very smart. It presents a consistent basis on a valid arguement.
Now it would be good to show tie ins and comparisons to how he handles his QBs in Chicago and Miami.
GazPhin
Brannigan Begin Again
Have to disagree on the Chicago testimony...
...it was a weak character reference based on hearsay and the character of the individual who made the assessment of Wanny's unknown. If I were counsel for the defense I would have onjected and asked that the testimony be thrown out, jurors disregard.
I hope that when the same thing occurs in the Dolphins organization with the honourable HWayneH presiding that the arguments discussed are dispassionate, based in fact and research and devoid of sentiment. Additionally, I would ask that they consider thoroughly whether they are improving/degrading the fins chances next season if they make a change.
...it was a weak character reference based on hearsay and the character of the individual who made the assessment of Wanny's unknown. If I were counsel for the defense I would have onjected and asked that the testimony be thrown out, jurors disregard.
I hope that when the same thing occurs in the Dolphins organization with the honourable HWayneH presiding that the arguments discussed are dispassionate, based in fact and research and devoid of sentiment. Additionally, I would ask that they consider thoroughly whether they are improving/degrading the fins chances next season if they make a change.