Miami Dolphins’ on-field decisions raising questions | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Miami Dolphins’ on-field decisions raising questions

phinatic1399

Diehard Phinatic!
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
2,912
Reaction score
23
Location
Syracuse, NY
The Dolphins have left themselves open to second-guessing with several personnel decisions the past two months, from Marc Colombo to Reggie Bush to the reluctance to sign a quality backup tight end. But there also have been several curious in-game decisions that were discussed this week:
• When the Dolphins made Karlos Dansby the highest paid inside linebacker in NFL history in March 2010 (five years, $43 million), he was expected to be among the unit’s top playmakers. But Dansby wasn’t on the field for any of the 13 plays on Cleveland’s game-winning touchdown drive Sunday.
Dansby said he was on the bench because he’s not part of the package Miami was using most of that drive. He said the Dolphins went to another package the final couple of plays, and defensive coordinator Mike Nolan said Thursday he should have sent Dansby back in.
Dansby said Nolan apologized to him Monday.
Koa Misi appeared at times in that late-game lineup, which included the team’s top pass-rushers and as many as six defensive backs. So why not use Dansby, the only NFL player with 25 sacks and 10 interceptions since 2004?
Said Nolan: “Cleveland was using a lot of receivers, and … you don’t want too many linebackers. The only [inside] linebacker we had on the field was Kevin Burnett.”
Dansby said he was surprised — “it was a frustrating situation” — but didn’t complain.
• Bush’s usage. Several analysts have said Bush isn’t ideally suited to be a between-the-tackles runner. But seven of Bush’s 28 carries have been up the middle. He gained 13 on the first of those seven but just 10 combined on the next six.
Bush has 4 yards on three carries when running behind right guard (Vernon Carey or John Jerry) and 18 yards on seven carries behind left guard Richie Incognito. His 2.9 per carry average is well below his 4.0 career mark.
What’s more, Bush averaged 6.0 and 5.5 receptions per game in his best years with the Saints but only 3.5 so far this season. The Dolphins know they must do more to maximize his skills.
Offensive coordinator Brian Daboll said Thursday he wants to use Bush at times not only as a slot receiver (something he did in the preseason but not last week), but also a bit as an outside receiver.
• Why do the Dolphins send Cameron Wake in pass coverage a few times a game when he’s their best pass rusher?
“To give someone else a chance to rush and disguise what he’s doing,” Nolan said. “If they are going to waste two players on Cameron … you would much rather have Cameron be the guy dropping and rush the other guy, because then you’ll get the matchup you want. It’s very difficult to get anyone to beat two players. Occasionally, you mix it up for that reason.”
• Deployment of cornerbacks. Nolan Carroll has been in position to be victimized more than many Dolphins fans can stomach this season for multiple reasons: the injury to Vontae Davis, which threatens to sideline him a second consecutive game Sunday; personnel moves (Miami opted to sign Will Allen and dump Benny Sapp after the opener, instead of keeping both), and the subsequent decision to use Carroll to fill in for the injured Davis, defending an outside receiver, instead of Allen.
That means Carroll played more last week than Allen (65 snaps to Allen’s 43). Pro Football Focus ranks Carroll’s play this season 100th of 101 cornerbacks. He has been targeted 16 times and allowed 11 catches for 155 yards.
CBS’ Dan Fouts noted that after Davis was injured against Houston, the Texans put 6-3 Andre Johnson on the 6-1 Carroll’s side of the field to try and keep him away from the 6-3 Sean Smith. Johnson beat Carroll for a touchdown, though Reshad Jones was mostly to blame.
Smith said such an approach makes sense because the Dolphins were often double-covering Johnson, and “Why put me on the side we’re doubling?” Smith said he and Davis are assigned to specific sides and have not switched at all this season. And San Diego’s dangerous 6-5 Vincent Jackson should pose more matchup issues Sunday.
• Late-game play selection. Even though Miami needed only 15 yards or so to get in field goal range late against Cleveland, offensive coordinator Brian Daboll defended the deep throw to Clyde Gates, noting it was a favorable matchup and “was six inches out of bounds.”
WQAM’s Channing Crowder said incredulously: “You’re going deep for a touchdown? You love these field goals, Tony [Sparano]. Kick another field goal!”
 
• Late-game play selection. Even though Miami needed only 15 yards or so to get in field goal range late against Cleveland, offensive coordinator Brian Daboll defended the deep throw to Clyde Gates, noting it was a favorable matchup and “was six inches out of bounds.”
WQAM’s Channing Crowder said incredulously: “You’re going deep for a touchdown? You love these field goals, Tony [Sparano]. Kick another field goal!”

That right there is a whole bunch of stupid.

Channing Crowder opened his ugly *** piehole in that blurb too, bringing
even more stupid to the table.

15 yards isn't a gimme in the NFL...Specially not for the Dolphins. Take
the shot downfield if you've got it.
 
i didn't think nate jones had been there long enough last week to man the nickle and thats how it played out but maybe this week if vd is out allen can start on the boundary and jones can man the nickle...jimmy wilson also needs to get run...he looked good last week
 
The "six inches out of bounds" comment about the Clyde Gates throw is stupid IMO.

This team needed a field goal to win, and ended up at the other team's 47 yard line to start the drive. Any low percentage pass that failed in that situation should not be defended by the coaching staff.
 
The Dolphins have left themselves open to second-guessing with several personnel decisions the past two months, from Marc Colombo to Reggie Bush to the reluctance to sign a quality backup tight end. But there also have been several curious in-game decisions that were discussed this week:
• When the Dolphins made Karlos Dansby the highest paid inside linebacker in NFL history in March 2010 (five years, $43 million), he was expected to be among the unit’s top playmakers. But Dansby wasn’t on the field for any of the 13 plays on Cleveland’s game-winning touchdown drive Sunday.
Dansby said he was on the bench because he’s not part of the package Miami was using most of that drive. He said the Dolphins went to another package the final couple of plays, and defensive coordinator Mike Nolan said Thursday he should have sent Dansby back in.
Dansby said Nolan apologized to him Monday.
Koa Misi appeared at times in that late-game lineup, which included the team’s top pass-rushers and as many as six defensive backs. So why not use Dansby, the only NFL player with 25 sacks and 10 interceptions since 2004?
Said Nolan: “Cleveland was using a lot of receivers, and … you don’t want too many linebackers. The only [inside] linebacker we had on the field was Kevin Burnett.”
Dansby said he was surprised — “it was a frustrating situation” — but didn’t complain.
• Bush’s usage. Several analysts have said Bush isn’t ideally suited to be a between-the-tackles runner. But seven of Bush’s 28 carries have been up the middle. He gained 13 on the first of those seven but just 10 combined on the next six.
Bush has 4 yards on three carries when running behind right guard (Vernon Carey or John Jerry) and 18 yards on seven carries behind left guard Richie Incognito. His 2.9 per carry average is well below his 4.0 career mark.
What’s more, Bush averaged 6.0 and 5.5 receptions per game in his best years with the Saints but only 3.5 so far this season. The Dolphins know they must do more to maximize his skills.
Offensive coordinator Brian Daboll said Thursday he wants to use Bush at times not only as a slot receiver (something he did in the preseason but not last week), but also a bit as an outside receiver.
• Why do the Dolphins send Cameron Wake in pass coverage a few times a game when he’s their best pass rusher?
“To give someone else a chance to rush and disguise what he’s doing,” Nolan said. “If they are going to waste two players on Cameron … you would much rather have Cameron be the guy dropping and rush the other guy, because then you’ll get the matchup you want. It’s very difficult to get anyone to beat two players. Occasionally, you mix it up for that reason.”
• Deployment of cornerbacks. Nolan Carroll has been in position to be victimized more than many Dolphins fans can stomach this season for multiple reasons: the injury to Vontae Davis, which threatens to sideline him a second consecutive game Sunday; personnel moves (Miami opted to sign Will Allen and dump Benny Sapp after the opener, instead of keeping both), and the subsequent decision to use Carroll to fill in for the injured Davis, defending an outside receiver, instead of Allen.
That means Carroll played more last week than Allen (65 snaps to Allen’s 43). Pro Football Focus ranks Carroll’s play this season 100th of 101 cornerbacks. He has been targeted 16 times and allowed 11 catches for 155 yards.
CBS’ Dan Fouts noted that after Davis was injured against Houston, the Texans put 6-3 Andre Johnson on the 6-1 Carroll’s side of the field to try and keep him away from the 6-3 Sean Smith. Johnson beat Carroll for a touchdown, though Reshad Jones was mostly to blame.
Smith said such an approach makes sense because the Dolphins were often double-covering Johnson, and “Why put me on the side we’re doubling?” Smith said he and Davis are assigned to specific sides and have not switched at all this season. And San Diego’s dangerous 6-5 Vincent Jackson should pose more matchup issues Sunday.
• Late-game play selection. Even though Miami needed only 15 yards or so to get in field goal range late against Cleveland, offensive coordinator Brian Daboll defended the deep throw to Clyde Gates, noting it was a favorable matchup and “was six inches out of bounds.”
WQAM’s Channing Crowder said incredulously: “You’re going deep for a touchdown? You love these field goals, Tony [Sparano]. Kick another field goal!”
why is no one calling for nolans head? as far as i no, he's in charge of the defence, on what plays and packages to run in certain situations. as far as i can see the defence has lost us all 3 games! yet there are people on this board want him to replace are current coach! upgrade? not what i can see!
 
the throw to gates against single coverage i take no issue with...i'm glad we actually grew a pair and tried to make a play and it was a good look...it just wasn't executed...i'd much rather see that than going immediately to the check down in the flat for a 2 yard damn gain...
 
the throw to gates against single coverage i take no issue with...i'm glad we actually grew a pair and tried to make a play and it was a good look...it just wasn't executed...i'd much rather see that than going immediately to the check down in the flat for a 2 yard damn gain...

Thank you.

Daboll gets props for "Going for the throat" and "having balls" if that play works.

Instead, everyone calls for check downs and conservitive play calling.

**** it. I'm GLAD he showed some confidence in our players.
 
what daboll should be taking a ton of heat for is the usage of reggie bush...its been a joke...completely wasting him...and if dt misses this week with that hammy i have a feeling we are gonna see a lot more of it...i just don't think these guys will bring in slaton and in 2 days ask him to help us much...barring bush getting injured
 
what daboll should be taking a ton of heat for is the usage of reggie bush...its been a joke...completely wasting him...and if dt misses this week with that hammy i have a feeling we are gonna see a lot more of it...i just don't think these guys will bring in slaton and in 2 days ask him to help us much...barring bush getting injured

Daboll deserves lots of blame for a number of things. I just don't see the reason to add in stuff
that doesn't apply.
 
true...you don't go out though and add a reggie bush unless you have a specific plan for how you are gonna play to his strengths with his usage...and running him b/t the tackles is not the answer...and should have been obvious well before camp and the season opener...running him b/t the tackles is like giving away downs...he needs to be in space and you need to get him favorable matchups vs lbs etc in the passing game by putting him in motion and sending him into the slot and wide and you should use him in the passing game like a wr more...not just a run of the mill rb where you flow hm out into the flats as a check down or all this boring stuff i'm seeing thus far...stuff any guy out of the backfield can do pretty much...he's not just a guy in that regard...don't use him like it

if you can't figure out ways to use him to his strengths you shouldn't have spent the money and brought him in in the first place...
 
true...you don't go out though and add a reggie bush unless you have a specific plan for how you are gonna play to his strengths with his usage...and running him b/t the tackles is not the answer...and should have been obvious well before camp and the season opener...running him b/t the tackles is like giving away downs...he needs to be in space and you need to get him favorable matchups vs lbs etc in the passing game by putting him in motion and sending him into the slot and wide and you should use him in the passing game like a wr more...not just a run of the mill rb where you flow hm out into the flats as a check down or all this boring stuff i'm seeing thus far...stuff any guy out of the backfield can do pretty much...he's not just a guy in that regard...don't use him like it

if you can't figure out ways to use him to his strengths you shouldn't have spent the money and brought him in in the first place...
What suggests stupidity on the coaches' part, IMO, is the fact that we're three games in, and Daboll is still talking about how he's going to use Bush. Why wasn't that built into the system from day one?

Again, I have to come back to the fact that Bush's former team won a Super Bowl with him in a certain role. Why not copy that role to a T?
 
Thank you.

Daboll gets props for "Going for the throat" and "having balls" if that play works.

Instead, everyone calls for check downs and conservitive play calling.

**** it. I'm GLAD he showed some confidence in our players.
But why "go for the juglar" if all you need is 15 yards and a field goal to win a game?

You go for the juglar when it's 4th and 1 on the goal line, and a TD would ice a game, whereas a field goal would leave the other team in it.

These kinds of approaches have their places and times. Needing 15 yards and a FG to win a game is not the time to show aggression for no reason.

What's stupid about this coaching staff IMO is that they seem to have these situations completely backwards. When they could put a team away by playing aggressively, they play conservatively instead, settle for field goals, and leave the other team in it. When they could win a game by playing conservatively, they go for the juglar and play aggressively.

Come on already.
 
But why "go for the juglar" if all you need is 15 yards and a field goal to win a game?

You go for the juglar when it's 4th and 1 on the goal line, and a TD would ice a game, whereas a field goal would leave the other team in it.

These kinds of approaches have their places and times. Needing 15 yards and a FG to win a game is not the time to show aggression for no reason.

What's stupid about this coaching staff IMO is that they seem to have these situations completely backwards. When they could put a team away by playing aggressively, they play conservatively instead, settle for field goals, and leave the other team in it. When they could win a game by playing conservatively, they go for the juglar and play aggressively.

Come on already.

You say that as if 15 yards being gained was an absolute.

If it was, I'd be with you. As it is, it's not. I see nothing wrong with taking
the shot downfield agasint 1-1 coverage.
 
You say that as if 15 yards being gained was an absolute.

If it was, I'd be with you. As it is, it's not. I see nothing wrong with taking
the shot downfield agasint 1-1 coverage.
Gaining the 15 yards is definitely not an absolute, but why call a low-percentage play that covers so much more than the 15 yards you need?

Why not call high-percentage plays that stand a much better chance of getting you your 15 yards?

Again, you gain nothing by being overly aggressive in that situation, other than looking "cool" and unpredictable perhaps.

As it was, we looked "cool" and unpredictable, and lost.
 
Back
Top Bottom