Mike Wallace Vs. Ted Ginn Jr. | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Mike Wallace Vs. Ted Ginn Jr.

Egnew the GOAT said:
What im saying is for 750k.. Ginn could be just as effective as a deep threat decoy as Wallace is.. Because right now.. All Wallace has been is a Decoy. I dont understand how its that hard to comprehend. Its the truth.

Am i saying Ginn is better? No.. What im saying is for all that Wallace has done so far this year... He could be replaced with just about any speed burner. Cuz all he is there for is a deep threat decoy right now.

]

---------- Post added at 12:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:32 PM ----------




WHen he signed the contract he signed it for 5 years 60 million... WIth 30 million coming in the first 2 years. THats where i got in from. Guess i am mistaken for what he is making this season.
Click to expand...


A bit of research can do wonders....also your argument doesn't consider the circumstances each player deals with on their respected teams....
 
Dont you know that if Ginn were here, the OL would have played better!
eger said:
So you think with the kind of protection Tanny's been getting, that Ginn would have faired better at getting more receptions?
Click to expand...
 
ConvenientTruth said:
A bit of research can do wonders....also your argument doesn't consider the circumstances each player deals with on their respected teams....
Click to expand...

So he makes 15 mil next season. So the **** what. I did google his contract and it said 30 mil first 2 years which is what i went by. Point is... 60 million dollar player is playing on the level of a 750k a year player.
 
Defenses would bully us much harder if Ted Ginn was out there instead of Wallace. My god dude, I understand your rationale but ask any defensive player or coordinator who they are more afraid of making a play against them, even considering the lackluster season he has had, 100% of them would tell you Wallace.
 
dolpns13 said:
Sooo you dont realize Ireland didnt draft Ginn?
Click to expand...
What? Who doesn't know that... just say'en it does "Sound like classic Ireland" Its been the same here forever...

Did you know old McDonald was a bad speller?
 
Travis34 said:
Defenses would bully us much harder if Ted Ginn was out there instead of Wallace. My god dude, I understand your rationale but ask any defensive player or coordinator who they are more afraid of making a play against them, even considering the lackluster season he has had, 100% of them would tell you Wallace.
Click to expand...

Again.... Another poster not getting my point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
truedolfan57 said:
Blasphemy! Ireland is the root of all evil!!!!!
Click to expand...

Thats not true...The guy has produced power house players and im sure his counterpart in NE is jealous of the teams he has assembled. His record speaks for itself no? People lie...history ...not so much
 
SB Dreamer said:
They drafted Ginn to high...paid him too high,trained him to much,said bye bye real quick and now he is where he belonged all along. A spotty threat who is still scared of contact but makes appropriate $$ for what he is asked to do.

Sounds like classic Ireland
Click to expand...

Ireland didn't pick him.
 
ConvenientTruth said:
Mike Wallace 4576 YArds 33 TD's (4.5 years)
Ted Ginn 2459 yards 9 TD's (6.5 years)
Click to expand...

Mike Wallace had Ben Rothlisberger throwing to him, a proven winner. Ted Ginn had Chad Henne throwing to him, a proven loser. What is your point?

Oh wait, does that mean the quarterback also has a factor in the ability of the receiver?
 
SB Dreamer said:
What? Who doesn't know that... just say'en it does "Sound like classic Ireland" Its been the same here forever...

Did you know old McDonald was a bad speller?
Click to expand...

Well considering Ireland didn't draft ginn I would think every dolphins fan would know that .. Unless your being sarcastic.. I can't tell now... But no , Ireland did not draft ginn
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom