But the defense is actually 3 for 5 in those situations. You are leaving out the fact that the defense was forced to face Green Bay and Detroit twice.

at the notion of trying to carry the defense's water for that complete collapse against the Packers. I'm sorry, but if you want to give them "1 for 2" credit for that game, or pin Cortland Finnegan's braindead inability to keep a guy in bounds with 30 seconds to play on Lamar Miller, Ryan Tannehill, Ja'Wuan James, Mike Wallace, whoever, then be my guest. Our offensive possession forced the Packers to burn all of their timeouts and subsequently have to drive the length of the field with no clock stoppages and score a
touchdown, yet you couch it as if they simply received the football and then immediately handed it right back to Green Bay on a fumble or something.
When I say that our defense failed to protect those leads in those two games, that's just what happened. That doesn't mean the defense played poorly overall or that it's a crap unit, but what happened happened.
We have a weird dichotomy going now on this site in which people are expected to either: A) blame the quarterback for everything, or B) 'make excuses' for why something that went wrong could have possibly been the result of someone else's poor play or decisions, and yet it's the B group that is looked on as the blind homers or insane folks.
It's comical. How come we don't blame the running game for the failures in the 4 minute drives? Oh, right, because A vs B.