KB21 said:Well, you will be surprised on draft day then.
Ummm... Not so sure bout that, but we'll see :cooldude:
KB21 said:Well, you will be surprised on draft day then.
PhinDude88 said:But dont you think that will be a waste pick for them? I figured that they would go with an OL to improve there OL even more.
ABrownLamp said:Listen...if we are #2, we will not be taking a RB that may or may not be better than the RB that can be selected at #32...sorry that's not what you do with the #2 pick...
KB21 said:You take the running back when he is rated that high and is the most complete back to enter the draft since the last runner that was drafted #2 overall (Marshall Faulk).
Jaj said:Your saying he's more complete than Ricky Williams? Ricky Williams was one of the highest RB to possibly ever enter the draft. Ronnie Brown is not on his level. The Eagles made a VERY BALLSY move by not taking him.
Jaj said:Ricky wasn't used in that way during college. Teams knew he had good hands, and he proved that, he just wasn't used often in that role. I guess Lamar Gordon is also a more complete back than Ricky...
KB21 said:No, because Lamar Gordon, at this point, can't run. He's too upright and hesitant in the running game.
Jaj said:Yea and I can question Ronnie Brown's vision and creativity when the blocking lanes break down. He's not complete.
Marshall Faulk complete? He was 210 pounds! That's not complete...
Ricky Williams was the closest player to complete.
Jaj said:Yea and I can question Ronnie Brown's vision and creativity when the blocking lanes break down. He's not complete.
Marshall Faulk complete? He was 210 pounds! That's not complete...
Ricky Williams was the closest player to complete.
burger13 said:LaDanian Tomlinson anyone?
KB21 said:Ricky was never complete. Ricky was never the receiver nor the blocker than Ronnie Brown is. That's why Indy took Edgerrin James over Ricky. James was the better receiver.