no no...this logo looks like the old Jets logo with the wing over the Jets name...that's the last thing we need is them saying that we want to look like their old styleDrAstroZoom said:Yikes. Not digging this particular direction.
no no...this logo looks like the old Jets logo with the wing over the Jets name...that's the last thing we need is them saying that we want to look like their old styleDrAstroZoom said:Yikes. Not digging this particular direction.
Ozzy said:No, this is your opinion, and not the majority opinion either. A lot might want change, but not because it's the only cartoon left in the NFL.
The Cardinal looks nothing close to the same style as the Falcon, the Raven, or the Eagle. None of them are remotely close in style.
The Dolphin is the only Fish logo in the entire league. Naturally it's going to be somewhat different.
How is it that the Bills logo is not cartoonish? I mean your talking about a dark brown animal that is red and blue!
Your going to tell me that the new Pats logo does not resemble a patriotic super hero. Super heros are cartoons, and even if you disagree with that, there is no way you can tell me that it is consistent with anything. It resembles nothing real, but yet it's a person. Just like a person in a cartoon would.
There are only two, maybe three logos that are not cartoonish (lettered logos not included). The Redskins logo, and the Cardinal and possibly the Panther.
If there are some comparisons it would be that the lion and the buffalo looks similar in theme. But guess what? The Raven, the Bronco, and the Dolphin look similar in theme.
Muck said:To the fight song, absolutely.
To the logo and colors, I think they're cool. I wouldn't be opposed to another logo. But I disagree with the article's author that the current on is a happy, silly looking fish.
I'm not opposed to change. I just don't think certain aspects are as dire as the author makes them out to be.
Ozzy said:No, this is your opinion, and not the majority opinion either. A lot might want change, but not because it's the only cartoon left in the NFL.
The Cardinal looks nothing close to the same style as the Falcon, the Raven, or the Eagle. None of them are remotely close in style.
The Dolphin is the only Fish logo in the entire league. Naturally it's going to be somewhat different.
How is it that the Bills logo is not cartoonish? I mean your talking about a dark brown animal that is red and blue!
Your going to tell me that the new Pats logo does not resemble a patriotic super hero. Super heros are cartoons, and even if you disagree with that, there is no way you can tell me that it is consistent with anything. It resembles nothing real, but yet it's a person. Just like a person in a cartoon would.
There are only two, maybe three logos that are not cartoonish (lettered logos not included). The Redskins logo, and the Cardinal and possibly the Panther.
If there are some comparisons it would be that the lion and the buffalo looks similar in theme. But guess what? The Raven, the Bronco, and the Dolphin look similar in theme.
SkapePhin said:How does the Bronco or the Raven resemble the Dolphin? Both the Bronco and Raven are only heads...
Listen, the reason the Dolphin looks like a cartoon is because it has a silly helmet on it, like the old logos of the 1930s that tried to tie in football with the logo.. It is simply not needed, and silly looking.. and the only reason you defend it so virulently is because of "tradition".. Had the Dolphin never had a helmet to begin with, you would defend that too..
Ozzy said:The Bronco and Raven pictures are tweaked to give a tougher look. The Raven also has a B on it like the Miami logo has an M. The Bills, and Lions logo sort of look like the animal it's supposed to, but the team colors are in them, just like the Dolphin.
Almost everyone logo can be seen as, as you put it, cartoonish!
Now it's your turn to listen. :)
Not until 1948 was the first logo, the Rams horns, painted on a pro leather helmet. Soon after, practically every college, pro and high school team put their logos and mascots on their helmets.
The little helmet, to YOU is silly, and just because you believe it, does not make it so. It's only your opinion, and I highly doubt that many totally agree with you. I surely don't agree.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with tradition. As a matter of fact it's crazy to keep trying to erase great traditions. That's my opinion. Ask the Packers fans if they want their logo changed. One of the oldest in the NFL. I bet they balk at the idea!
Your trying to erase something that's been part of the team since it began. Helmet or not, most of your artwork on the matter is a total different look, and that I'm totally against. I'm not saying they're ugly, but they dont belong as the official logo IMO.
I never got into this thread until someone asked why people downed the thought of change. He said it would HELP the organization. :shakeno: I was getting a kick out of the artwork until that point.
As many posts and threads you've written in about this subject, I've never said "hey stop that". I'm fine with dealing with it, but just be sure that I'll speak up on tradition. It's in my blood.![]()
MetalKev said:i like the one with the D but see if u can make the D bigger and have the dolphin jumping through it and the facemask aqua then i think it would be cool
Furious Yellow said:Something like this?
I acually think that would look really cool on the helmet
Furious Yellow said:Something like this?
![]()
I acually think that would look really cool on the helmet
SkapePhin said:Nice sig.. but it is WAY over the allowed file size.. 1500k? I think the max is 50k..