I think if you deny Philbin any say to the personnel management, then you're back at square 1 with not knowing how to determine Philbin's value to the team. Ross wants Philbin to have a say because Ireland, having denied him that collaboration, hurt the team's chances of winning. Miami's trying to move away from that separation of interests -- who the coaches wanted on the field, and who they got; it never added up, and results showed.
I am not saying he shouldn't have say but it would concern me if he has all the power that he hasn't earned. I guess it didn't work the other way so they can try this but I would be concerned.
To be perfectly honest, I don't think he earned it. I think he persuaded Ross that his plan, unfettered by Ireland, would lead to success.
And I think Ross gave him one year to prove it.
do you think one year is fair?