When we kept 5 on the 53, I thought for sure that was just a temp move.
How do you guys see the position group playing out?
This is fascinating to me.
How do you guys see the position group playing out?
This is fascinating to me.
hunter long, mike gesicki, durham smythe play on offense as tight ends.When we kept 5 on the 53, I thought for sure that was just a temp move.
How do you guys see the position group playing out?
This is fascinating to me.
Shaheen had a nice year last year and was a bit of a surprise. At some point I was thinking we’d cut 1 and pick up a 4th RB - but then again we have 2 RBs on the PS.hunter long, mike gesicki, durham smythe play on offense as tight ends.
shaheen should go.
cephus mccarter should do his special teams demon thing regardless of what position group he is assigned to on the depth chart.
i think he's a good player.Shaheen had a nice year last year and was a bit of a surprise. At some point I was thinking we’d cut 1 and pick up a 4th RB - but then again we have 2 RBs on the PS.
I think this is a possibility. Someone will overpay for him (ala Charles Clay) and I don’t know that we’ll match. I don’t think the staff values him as much as the open market will.Dont sign Gesecki to an extension.let some sucker pay him and grab that comp pick.
It’s possible we won’t be willing to pay him top TE money and he will get that in FA.Shaheen is gonna stay, Gesicki will be dropped
I saw some writer suggest that starting a rookie at LT caused us to go to more blocking TEs instead of using Gesecki.OL issues are most likely forcing additional protection assignments, instead of roaming the middle of the field flagging down a ride.
I saw some writer suggest that starting a rookie at LT caused us to go to more blocking TEs instead of using Gesecki.