PFF on Phins Game #1

[Sirspud]

Gibson or Matthews could be argued as a #3, but the reality was that Wallace, Hartline, and Clay didn't play.

Forgot about Clay. I do think Tannehill had as much chemistry with Gibson from the get go as he did with Hartline.

 

[NRA]

RT's 6/6 , 1 TD drive performance was nothing of note with all his starting receivers on the bench?

this is when you know your team has a real deal, solid scheme offense.

how many years did we see the bills and 49er's, the packers, vikings, etc.... score points all over the place, their qb's have 902.9 qb rating and it just didnt seem to matter who was in or who was drafted. another body would come in and BANG, they are on sports center.

our star power on offense was out. rookies and wannabee's lined up for tanny. THE SCHEME!! it gets people open, just as bill walshes wco did in the 80's through the early 90's. yeah, they had jerry rice, but it just didnt matter, i mean since were talking 4.7 wr's [unwarranted in landry's case], jerry rice was a very close TRUE 4.7 wr. he WAS slow, track wise. bu that scheme was well planned and executed and IT made players be open rather than having players who have to MAKE IT happen with top speed and athleticism.

its early, but, that is a tale tell sign of a great offense on the horizon. and it will MAKE stars.

 

[sm0kinfins]

Yeah, I compare my eyeballs to theirs many a time, and also theirs to mine in re-watching the OL. We are normally very close on the OL.

Is that you, Omar?

 

[So Be]

Is that you, Omar?

Personal attacks are not allowed here. JK/LOL