Pre-Season Position Group Battles: Running Backs | Page 4 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Pre-Season Position Group Battles: Running Backs

There has been some tlk about Achane being lined up as a WR and in the slot to get him more touches without exposing him to as much physical contact presumably.

McD seems to be pretty good at getting playmakers the ball in good spots so we might see Achane moved around as a match up weapon more this year.
 
As Brother Loco so aptly described, we are in the dead zone of the NFL season... and, we are all bored. So I thought maybe I could do a series of posts about the upcoming camp battles. We'll see if there's any interest. I'll start with an easy one, the Running Back room.

In the past, we have usually broken camp with 4 RBs and a FB, though we did cut to a bare 3 RBs one year. This was only an initial roster however, the 3 RB room was eventually expanded back to 4.

So, I will assume that we'll go with 4 and 1 again this year.

First up, the Ingold room. We only have one FB, and we use him in a lot of different ways, carrying the ball is not one of them. Our FB blocks, acts as an H-back, and occasionally splits out wide. For these reasons, Brooks, although of FB size, is not even remotely in this conversation. Ingold is a unique player and has no camp competition. If Ingold gets cut or becomes injured, we'll have no FB on the roster.

The RB room isn't much harder to decipher. Achane, Mostert, and Wright are absolute locks. The only real question here is "who gets the largest number of snaps?".
Wright will immediately be the best pass protector in this room; he's also a plus receiver with only one drop last year. If he's a quick study and learns the offense, I suspect he's the third-down option almost immediately. He's also heavier than Achane and Mostert and may see the short yardage snaps.
Achane should be our first down option. If teams play the pass, he'll have huge gaps to run through again. He's much younger than Mostert and will get first crack at the nominal starting job.
Mostert was amazing last year; most RBs are retired by the time they reach his age. Last year was the best of his career... but honestly, I think we can expect regression this year. I do think we can expect to see him touch the ball 5-10 times per game, and he may continue to get the red zone touches unless Wright supplants him here. He is moving into the back up part of his career.

The rest of our RBs are fighting for one job, a spot that might not exist. If the battle is close, the team might cut all of them and see who goes unclaimed... then resign whoever makes it through waivers when we move rehabbing players to short-term I.R. on the Monday following cut-down day. I seriously doubt that all three would be claimed by other teams. Waived RBs usually aren't.

Wilson probably has first call. He's a McD favourite and has been around awhile. He doesn't really have one area where he excels though, and that's a bad bet for a committee RB room. No real role.
Brooks, who a lot of the FH brothers like, really hasn't shown much. He's looked OKish in preseason, but for those who like him, I've gotta ask you this... "If the team really liked him, why would they move up to draft Wright?". I think he's a guy who could be cut and resigned to the PS. If we lose him... eh... he was a UDFA.
Then there's Ahmed. I suspect his one and only chance is if Achane or Mostert are injured. He brings nothing to the table... he's on a vet minimum salary with no bonus. He has one foot out of the NFL.

Feel free to tell me where I'm wrong, I'm used to that... I have a wife and 6 kids.
Well done FD! I agree on Mostert regressing a bit but even 70% of what he did last year would be unbelievable while expecting Achane to become the prominent RB in the room. Wright's an off the charts asset as well. Never drops a pass, will run through you or past you, and will pick up the blitz like a boss.
 
PFF ranks our RBs as second to the Niners:

2. MIAMI DOLPHINS

The Dolphins earned the highest team rushing grade last season, at 94.1. Their top two backs, Raheem Mostert and De’Von Achane, recorded elite rushing grades of 91.7 and 93.1, respectively.

As a group, Miami tallied the most explosive runs of 20 yards or more last season (61). The Dolphins added another speedster to their backfield in the offseason in rookie Jaylen Wright from Tennessee.

 
Because as you saw the last two years our RBs have been banged up. Have you not been watching? So, in the NFL, more is better at the RB position. It a brutal job. And Brooks will make the cut. For the little we saw of him he’s a violent physical runner. He reminds me a bit of Marshawn Lynch
Agreed Easy. I think Brooks will make it as our 4th RB, We need a big violent RB on short yardage situations. And HOPEFULLY, McD has learned that pounding the rock is a good thing!
 
Agreed Easy. I think Brooks will make it as our 4th RB, We need a big violent RB on short yardage situations. And HOPEFULLY, McD has learned that pounding the rock is a good thing!
Why is #2 staring at me
 
Great write up. Only thing I really disagree with is Chris Brooks. He looked fantastic in very limited action nearly broke two long TDs against Denver and Carolina. The one against Carolina he threw the LB into the S knocking them both out of the play with a stiff arm. I have high hopes that he is our short yardage back this year.
 
As Brother Loco so aptly described, we are in the dead zone of the NFL season... and, we are all bored. So I thought maybe I could do a series of posts about the upcoming camp battles. We'll see if there's any interest. I'll start with an easy one, the Running Back room.

In the past, we have usually broken camp with 4 RBs and a FB, though we did cut to a bare 3 RBs one year. This was only an initial roster however, the 3 RB room was eventually expanded back to 4.

So, I will assume that we'll go with 4 and 1 again this year.

First up, the Ingold room. We only have one FB, and we use him in a lot of different ways, carrying the ball is not one of them. Our FB blocks, acts as an H-back, and occasionally splits out wide. For these reasons, Brooks, although of FB size, is not even remotely in this conversation. Ingold is a unique player and has no camp competition. If Ingold gets cut or becomes injured, we'll have no FB on the roster.

The RB room isn't much harder to decipher. Achane, Mostert, and Wright are absolute locks. The only real question here is "who gets the largest number of snaps?".
Wright will immediately be the best pass protector in this room; he's also a plus receiver with only one drop last year. If he's a quick study and learns the offense, I suspect he's the third-down option almost immediately. He's also heavier than Achane and Mostert and may see the short yardage snaps.
Achane should be our first down option. If teams play the pass, he'll have huge gaps to run through again. He's much younger than Mostert and will get first crack at the nominal starting job.
Mostert was amazing last year; most RBs are retired by the time they reach his age. Last year was the best of his career... but honestly, I think we can expect regression this year. I do think we can expect to see him touch the ball 5-10 times per game, and he may continue to get the red zone touches unless Wright supplants him here. He is moving into the back up part of his career.

The rest of our RBs are fighting for one job, a spot that might not exist. If the battle is close, the team might cut all of them and see who goes unclaimed... then resign whoever makes it through waivers when we move rehabbing players to short-term I.R. on the Monday following cut-down day. I seriously doubt that all three would be claimed by other teams. Waived RBs usually aren't.

Wilson probably has first call. He's a McD favourite and has been around awhile. He doesn't really have one area where he excels though, and that's a bad bet for a committee RB room. No real role.
Brooks, who a lot of the FH brothers like, really hasn't shown much. He's looked OKish in preseason, but for those who like him, I've gotta ask you this... "If the team really liked him, why would they move up to draft Wright?". I think he's a guy who could be cut and resigned to the PS. If we lose him... eh... he was a UDFA.
Then there's Ahmed. I suspect his one and only chance is if Achane or Mostert are injured. He brings nothing to the table... he's on a vet minimum salary with no bonus. He has one foot out of the NFL.

Feel free to tell me where I'm wrong, I'm used to that... I have a wife and 6 kids.
Agree with your conclusions but quibble on the concept that committee backs need to excel at something their stablemates don't. What the team seems to want first and always is speed and elusiveness and the top 3 are alike in that way. Beyond that they have differences but I don't think the team wants specialists that risk telegraphing the play call. My guess is they would ideally like 3 of a kind and the top 3 are as close as they could get
 
Back
Top Bottom