Meaningless.
Ryan Tannehill 2013: QB Pressure, Completion %, Deep Passing, & YPA Statistics
- Thread starter Shouright
- Start date
Meaningless.
You mean like when someone calls 3.8 "above average" in a sample with a mean of 3.74 and a standard deviation of 0.47? :unsure:
Lol I'm done
Well if the correlation of 0.375 between QB rating and rushing yards per game is meaningless, what is this (below)? Less meaningless?
Your repeated attempt to use game to game correlation is meaningless. Same mistake over and over.
---------- Post added at 10:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:17 PM ----------
Do the Colts play in the AFCE? A big reason they are in the playoffs is the division they play in.
Your repeated responding to posts without understanding them is meaningless. The correlation isn't based on game-to-game data. The correlation is based on season QB ratings and season numbers of rushing yards.
2413fanphins
Active Roster
your kidding me right? if they finish 8-8 they make the playoffs. they were the only team in that division that could muster a record over .500
THAT's the reason they are IN the playoffs.
2413fanphins
Active Roster
whats the correlation between gravity and 1 star threads?
Phinatic8u
Club Member
The colts got a better run game and oline than Miami..
Well only about 5 teams have a worse running game lol
Can someone post that beating a dead horse gif?
Still meaningless. You are on a never ending search for high correlation values where they shouldn't exist. You then use the low correlations as "proof" for something. That is why they are meaningless.
A low correlation between QB rating and rushing yards is only meaningful if other factors impacting the QB rating are equal. How do you know that some of the teams with good rushing numbers don't happen to have crappy QBs thereby ruining the correlation. The post you responded to referenced quality QBs. The very best QB ratings have teams with good QBs and good rushing attacks. In other words, with QBs of similar skills a running game may be a deciding factor, but a good running game isn't going to turn Brandon Weeden into Peyton Manning.
Now give it a rest.
OnDaChainWax
☠️ Banned ☠️
Rofl i love a good statistics debate. Clearly, stats are vital. How else are we to deduce that Ryan Tannehill is just as productive as Tom Brady?
Heres a stat for you: 8-8, no playoffs. Clearly, Tannehill cant win games alone but that is the only stat that matters baby.
The irony of it all is that we have the biggst stat junkies on Dolphins forums when Miami has the single greatest example of why stats dont mean ****. I present to the noble statisticians the incomparable #13.
Heres a stat for you: 8-8, no playoffs. Clearly, Tannehill cant win games alone but that is the only stat that matters baby.
The irony of it all is that we have the biggst stat junkies on Dolphins forums when Miami has the single greatest example of why stats dont mean ****. I present to the noble statisticians the incomparable #13.
You have it backwards. I use numbers to suggest that the null hypothesis shouldn't be rejected, in response to posts that suggest it should. Your post above suggests that I'm rejecting the null hypothesis with numbers.
The game-to-game data is no different. It suggests the null hypothesis shouldn't be rejected.
Now, perhaps you should give it a rest.
Ilovemyfins4eva
Active Roster
ya, exactly, keep making ****ing excuses.
they ****ing went 11-5 and made the playoffs, they didnt win there division at 8-8, and they have 3 quality wins at san fran, vs indy and vs seattle, and at least they ****ing take advantage of the weak teams in there division and beat them, we ****ing lose to buffalo 2 times and the jets.