tannehill will NEVER be in the same class as luck. he left so many points on the field this year it was staggering. but according to most people on here hes the second coming and should never, ever be critisized. the only stat that matters is 15-17.
So then what is the hypothesis he's postulating? That when teams have a good quarterback and a good running game, they're better than teams that have only one of the two?
Well no ****.
Keep living in your fantasy world. Don't let me stop you. Use all the hyperbole you need to make your case. It really is more convincing that way.
a-hole fans cause we speak the truth? 4 years ive been watching tannehill and 4 years hes been up and down and inconsistent. you can say whatever you want behind your keyboard and act like a tough guy but 4 years of mediocrity bozo...4 years.
the only stat that matters is 15-17.
what benefit of the doubt should we give to tannehill now?
luck has carried the team into the playoffs his 1st 2 seasons. yes ur right football is a team game, but the qb gets most of the credit when things go good, and when things go bad most of the blame whether its there doing or there fault.
luck also has no run game, no defense, and depleted wr core. yet he makes things work.
what should i do, rip him for going into foxboro and playing well for 3 qtrs before falling apart? ok, i wish we were in position to critique tannehill after losing in the divisional round in foxboro and keeping us in the game until the 4th.
there is no comparison right now between the 2, none. one is far ahead of the other, at least for now.
lol what fantasy world am i living in?
i am seeing reality, if you truly believe that tannehill is comparable to luck, you are lost.
No coach either. What the **** is he doing punting 21 down with a yard to go?
what was not convincing about his record as a dolphin? add to that we were 1 inch from losing to pitt and a danny amendola drop from losing to the cheats. this team is much closer to 6-10 than 8-8.
tannehill is not a hall of fame qb
you are certainly one of them if you believe that luck and tannehill are comparable and that our qb deserves practically no blame for our offensive woes. he only deserves credit for our success, right?Of course they are not comparable. Luck's team would crush a team led by the crappy Tannehill.....
The number of clowns on this site is staggering.
you are certainly one of them if you believe that luck and tannehill are comparable and that our qb deserves practically no blame for our offensive woes. he only deserves credit for our success, right?
0.68, compared to 0.64 with QB rating only.Really? is that true? What is the correlation?
you are certainly one of them if you believe that luck and tannehill are comparable and that our qb deserves practically no blame for our offensive woes. he only deserves credit for our success, right?