Ryan Tannehill's Deep Ball Hasn't Improved Since Texas A&M | Page 12 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Ryan Tannehill's Deep Ball Hasn't Improved Since Texas A&M

enigmatics said:
Perhaps on the balls thrown within a certain radius and tighter coverage ....... however my qualms are with the wide open misses. There were an unacceptable amount of those this year.
Click to expand...
Yes there was. Wallace dropped a couple but there many misfires by Tannehill on deep throws. It's one of the reasons that I'm pissed that we have the same qb coach next year. He could benefit from a experienced proven qb coach.
 
shoveyjoe2442 said:
Yes there was. Wallace dropped a couple but there many misfires by Tannehill on deep throws. It's one of the reasons that I'm pissed that we have the same qb coach next year. He could benefit from a experienced proven qb coach.
Click to expand...

It still amazes me that Taylor has a job.
 
enigmatics said:
Perhaps on the balls thrown within a certain radius and tighter coverage ....... however my qualms are with the wide open misses. There were an unacceptable amount of those this year.
Click to expand...

Most of the deep misses were under thrown. Half of them could have been caught with a better effort from Wallace. The Angry Deniers claim that Wallace doesn't play that way.... WTF?
 
enigmatics said:
It still amazes me that Taylor has a job.
Click to expand...

Honestly, it's the last straw when it comes to Philibin.

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:29 PM ----------
FinfanInBuffalo said:
Most of the deep misses were under thrown. Half of them could have been caught with a better effort from Wallace. The Angry Deniers claim that Wallace doesn't play that way.... WTF?
Click to expand...

Wallace is not that type of receiver.
 
FinfanInBuffalo said:
Most of the deep misses were under thrown. Half of them could have been caught with a better effort from Wallace. The Angry Deniers claim that Wallace doesn't play that way.... WTF?
Click to expand...

Wallace's shortcoming are a whole separate issue. But him having them does not excuse Tanny of his own.

---------- Post added at 01:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:31 AM ----------
mrbunglez said:
You gotta love nepotism.
Click to expand...

Yeah that and chronyism ..... that's what really pissed me off coming into this regime. Seemed like it was a group of good'ol boys as opposed to coaches who brought something to the table.
 
I actually thought Philbin would've gone with McAdoo as the OC just because he knew him. Shocked the hell outta me when I saw Lazor get hired TBH.
 
enigmatics said:
Ya the whole "How dare I support my team's QB" argument had nothing to do with it right? If you say so guy in Buffalo. LOL

---------- Post added at 01:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:24 AM ----------



You know what can't be denied? The winning QB today (Manning) hit balls down field with some semblance of regularity today.

Awaiting your angry deflection.
Click to expand...

You still seem self conscious. I'm starting to feel bad for you.


Change the topic? Typical Angry Denier tactic.

---------- Post added at 08:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:33 PM ----------
enigmatics said:
Wallace's shortcoming are a whole separate issue. But him having them does not excuse Tanny of his own.
Click to expand...

Not a separate issue when discussing the problems with completing the long ball. Half of the issue was Wallace. Although Angry Deniers usually deny it.
 
shoveyjoe2442 said:
Yes there was. Wallace dropped a couple but there many misfires by Tannehill on deep throws. It's one of the reasons that I'm pissed that we have the same qb coach next year. He could benefit from a experienced proven qb coach.
Click to expand...

There might be a chance that Lazor can talk Philbin into making a change or Lazor can work with Thill also. One can always hope.
 
At this point can the mods just sticky a thread at the top of the forum titled " shouright/gravity selective statistical analysis; FinfaninBuffalo pissing into the wind mega thread." I don't know why you even try FinfaninBuffalo, Shou isn't going to agree with you at any point because you cannot produce numbers that back your beliefs. The problem is you're trying to win a debate where the person you're attempting to debate is making all of the rules, and he's making them as he goes. This argument is like watching a christian and an atheist argue the existence of god, the christian says you can't prove god doesn't exist to the atheist. The atheist says you can't prove he does to the christian. The Christian says my faith says he does, the atheist says my lack of faith says he doesn't. Nobody ever wins, nobody ever will win.
 
enigmatics said:
It still amazes me that Taylor has a job.
Click to expand...
Second this, I'm not familiar with good/great Qb coaches in the league but surely there is at least one person available that could do more with T-hill than Sherman's son in law.
 
jnewmant said:
At this point can the mods just sticky a thread at the top of the forum titled " shouright/gravity selective statistical analysis; FinfaninBuffalo pissing into the wind mega thread." I don't know why you even try FinfaninBuffalo, Shou isn't going to agree with you at any point because you cannot produce numbers that back your beliefs. The problem is you're trying to win a debate where the person you're attempting to debate is making all of the rules, and he's making them as he goes. This argument is like watching a christian and an atheist argue the existence of god, the christian says you can't prove god doesn't exist to the atheist. The atheist says you can't prove he does to the christian. The Christian says my faith says he does, the atheist says my lack of faith says he doesn't. Nobody ever wins, nobody ever will win.
Click to expand...

I don't care if he agrees with me. I merely want to point out that his approaches are BS and neither he or any of the other Angry Deniers will apply the same analysis or criticism to any other QB. Not to change their minds but to point out their lack of integrity.

BTW, I have received hundreds of thanks on those posts while the ability to thank or no thank shouright's posts is blocked. That should tell you something.
 
jnewmant said:
Shou isn't going to agree with you at any point because you cannot produce numbers that back your beliefs.
Click to expand...
True, although if someone does support his beliefs with something objective, I'll give it a great deal of very thoughtful consideration. :up:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom