Finole
FinHeaven VIP
- Joined
- May 3, 2006
- Messages
- 2,257
- Reaction score
- 0
I am currently reading Nick Saban's book, and I have to tell you, I am impressed. Belichick wrote the introduction. They're good friends.
And then I watched the Pats dismantle the Vikes this past Monday night, and I got to thinking... How the hell does Belichick do it?
Well, the Pats did go 5-11 Belichick's first year. BTW, Brady rode the bench that entire season. But then they won the Super Bowl his 2nd year. Why hasn't Saban enjoyed this kind of success?
The simple answer: luck.
Yep. The Pats benefitted from a weak schedule because of their 5-11 finish. 9 of their 11 victories came against teams with losing records. A win is a win to be sure. But it's a little easier to win when your opponents aren't very good. Their two other wins came against division rivals: the Jets and the Fins.
The best team they played that year was St. Louis. They lost. But Belichick got to study his future Super Bowl opponent up close. Brady threw one touchdown pass in 3 playoff games! They benefitted from the tuck rule, and Vinatieri made a 48-yarder to win the Super Bowl. This is not a team that dominated opponents.
The Pats were exposed in 2002. With a tougher schedule, they finished 9-7 and failed to make the playoffs.
So what I'm getting at is this: Belichick got lucky early on, but his dynasty wasn't completely built until 2003. It took him four years:
2000: 5-11 (rebuilding year)
2001: 11-5 (due to a weak schedule and good luck)
2002: 9-7 (exposed)
2003: 14-2
Here's my prediction for Nick Saban:
2005: 9-7 (due to a weak schedule and good luck)
2006: 5-11 (exposed)
2007: 11-5
2008: 14-2
And then I watched the Pats dismantle the Vikes this past Monday night, and I got to thinking... How the hell does Belichick do it?
Well, the Pats did go 5-11 Belichick's first year. BTW, Brady rode the bench that entire season. But then they won the Super Bowl his 2nd year. Why hasn't Saban enjoyed this kind of success?
The simple answer: luck.
Yep. The Pats benefitted from a weak schedule because of their 5-11 finish. 9 of their 11 victories came against teams with losing records. A win is a win to be sure. But it's a little easier to win when your opponents aren't very good. Their two other wins came against division rivals: the Jets and the Fins.
The best team they played that year was St. Louis. They lost. But Belichick got to study his future Super Bowl opponent up close. Brady threw one touchdown pass in 3 playoff games! They benefitted from the tuck rule, and Vinatieri made a 48-yarder to win the Super Bowl. This is not a team that dominated opponents.
The Pats were exposed in 2002. With a tougher schedule, they finished 9-7 and failed to make the playoffs.
So what I'm getting at is this: Belichick got lucky early on, but his dynasty wasn't completely built until 2003. It took him four years:
2000: 5-11 (rebuilding year)
2001: 11-5 (due to a weak schedule and good luck)
2002: 9-7 (exposed)
2003: 14-2
Here's my prediction for Nick Saban:
2005: 9-7 (due to a weak schedule and good luck)
2006: 5-11 (exposed)
2007: 11-5
2008: 14-2