Lets see... Wallace/Hartline/Gibson/Clay for Stills/Jennings/Parker/Cameron????????
Wallace > Stills
Hartline < Parker, or Jennings
Gibson < Parker or Jennings
Cameron = Clay
I gave edge to Wallace based on career production, but what we see is what we get with Wallace, it wouldn't surprise me at all if Stills became a better WR than Wallace as soon as this season. I know Parker hasn't proved jack squat in the NFL so it's just my opinion but he is far and away a better WR than Hartline or Gibson, Jennings even though is old and has slowed down is also a much better option than those two. Cameron I think is a better target than Clay, but I put them equal because of injury history and uncertainty of Cameron. All in all we improved by a good margin IMO...Stills can be as good as Wallace as a deep threat, Jennings is a savvy route runner and will get open, and Parker can do some things that none of the other WR's we've had since Brandon Marshall can do.