So, should we have Sucked for Luck? | Page 5 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

So, should we have Sucked for Luck?

Should we have Sucked for Luck?

  • Yes

    Votes: 168 72.7%

  • No

    Votes: 45 19.5%

  • I'm still in shock about today so my brain doesn't work right now

    Votes: 18 7.8%
  • Total voters
    231
I was all in on Suck for Luck, but I wonder if any in the Play to Win crowd have changed their minds after seeing us trade Brandon Marshall away for what will probably wind up being a John Jerry and a Lorenzo Booker. Unless something huge happens soon, it looks like we're in for another 4-12 type season.
 
Anyone who calls it a "defeatist attitude" needs to smack themselves in the face and realize that what it really is, is a: "Let's get this ****ing thing right already before I kick someone in the face" attitude.
 
Almost everyone applauded the new coach hiring.

It was expected he would try to bring his QB along and run a WCO.

Peyton came available and we all went goo goo about the prospects.

The dolphins are just sticking to their original plan Flynn , OL , defence.

Marshell was borderline (not the desease) anyways with his comments about our qb. The nightclub fight was just the last straw.

They may still draft a QB in the first round just not the one you guys wanted.

Save the "I told you so's" until you see the finshed product.

Play to win . Anything else is bull ****. I've said my peace. Flame away.
 
playing to win at 0-7 is called fools gold. we needed losses at that point, not bull**** wins.
 
phinz8202 said:
playing to win at 0-7 is called fools gold. we needed losses at that point, not bull**** wins.
Click to expand...

The SFL stuff started after our 3rd loss to Cleveland I believe. At 0 and 7 it made some sence but after 3 loses to give up the season for Luck was going overboard if you ask me. It a new year. Move on gentlemen.
 
After losing to ****ing Cleveland, the writing was on the wall...
 
fishfanmiami said:
The SFL stuff started after our 3rd loss to Cleveland I believe. At 0 and 7 it made some sence but after 3 loses to give up the season for Luck was going overboard if you ask me. It a new year. Move on gentlemen.
Click to expand...

I think maybe one team has ever come back from an 0-3 start to make the playoffs, so it's not as overboard as you might think.
 
fishfanmiami said:
The SFL stuff started after our 3rd loss to Cleveland I believe. At 0 and 7 it made some sence but after 3 loses to give up the season for Luck was going overboard if you ask me. It a new year. Move on gentlemen.
Click to expand...
I was borderline until I saw the team flat out quit against the jests (game 6). That team didn't deserve fan support and I had no problem at all with Suck for Luck at that point. For those that were on it after 3 loses, they clearly saw what this team was before the rest. It's not their fault it took others longer to see it. Hell, many of us saw what that team was in the offseason and were similarly told to "wait to see the final product." Some can see what things are adding up to, just like now.

This team hasn't done anything to deserve anything but scrutiny from it's fans.
 
Dolphins7273 said:
I think maybe one team has ever come back from an 0-3 start to make the playoffs, so it's not as overboard as you might think.
Click to expand...
So if we start 0 and 3 again it's suck for Barkley ? I'm getting too old to keep waiting till next year.
Bet anyone that our Dolphins end up with a better record than the Colts with Luck.
 
Gonzo said:
I was borderline until I saw the team flat out quit against the jests (game 6). That team didn't deserve fan support and I had no problem at all with Suck for Luck at that point. For those that were on it after 3 loses, they clearly saw what this team was before the rest. It's not their fault it took others longer to see it. Hell, many of us saw what that team was in the offseason and were similarly told to "wait to see the final product." Some can see what things are adding up to, just like now.

This team hasn't done anything to deserve anything but scrutiny from it's fans.
Click to expand...

Cann;t argue with any of that. But they did fire Tony and did get in the Manning chase so let's wait and see what product they put on the field before we go back into our suck mode. Great sig amigo.
 
fishfanmiami said:
Cann;t argue with any of that. But they did fire Tony and did get in the Manning chase so let's wait and see what product they put on the field before we go back into our suck mode. Great sig amigo.
Click to expand...
Which they should have done the year before, WITH Ireland. Keeping Ireland was a huge mistake, IMO. Should have wiped that mess of Parcells slate clean.
 
Gonzo said:
Which they should have done the year before, WITH Ireland. Keeping Ireland was a huge mistake, IMO. Should have wiped that mess of Parcells slate clean.
Click to expand...

Agreed
 
I can't believe how damn lucky the Colts are. It just isn't fair. They have had over a decade of double digit wins, and then then ONE year that their HOF QB goes down, they suck enough to get one of the best QB prospects ever.

Downright criminal luck.
 
Damn horse shoes. i still think we will have a better record than the rebuilding Colts.
 
fishfanmiami said:
Damn horse shoes. i still think we will have a better record than the rebuilding Colts.
Click to expand...
This year. 3 years from now, I'm not so sure. They're rebuilding the right way. QB first and foremost.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom