We are all thinking about who to draft, who to sign as a FA, etc.
But how do we avoid streaks?
Win 3, lose 3, win 5, lose 5, win 1 lose 1.
Is that as simple as the schedule having us play softer teams then harder teams?
Coaching?
Player leaders?
IMO it was mostly coaching. I thought McD stuck with his over-aggressive tendencies and became predictable. His scheme is a good one and has answers when defenses take certain things away, but he (and Tua) didn't use those alternatives enough. In contrast I thought Burrow and Zach Taylor did a great job of relying on the run game and check downs when Buffalo used their athletic LBs to take away the deeper routes. That's encouraging b/c two seasons ago I felt Taylor was a joke as a HC. He was much better the next season during their SB run, but still had many time management issues (similar to McD in year 1). So the improvement in the game plan was encouraging. Burrow also was so much more patient. He has always had fast processing, but even last year tended to wait too long for his big WRs to break open and took too many hits. But in the third year of the same system you saw him get rid of the ball quicker. Actually it really wasn't until the end of the third season. He started of the year still holding the ball too long, but during this last third of the season he's been phenomenal.
On defense, I felt Boyer failed to adapt to all the injuries he had. I don't think he's a bad DC, but he does have some limitations. We simply didn't have players capable of running his preferred scheme with all those key injuries, but he tended to fall back to those tendencies in critical situations, like third and long. You can get away with more high risk plays when you have better players, but when you're relying on 5th and 6th CBs you have to protect them more.
Our personnel switched to having more DL pressure players than man coverage guys. IMO Boyer should have adjusted to more zones to take away the quick pass and let our safeties play deeper to protect the boundary corners. Our DL was getting pressure and hurries, but most QBs just got the ball out quicker with easy reads. Flooding the quick zones would have helped more of those hurries become sacks.
While I don't believe our talent was as good as Cincy or KC, I do believe that our talent was at that 10-11 win level. I think that's where we should have ended up if the coaching had been a little better. Now I do have a ton of faith in McD. People focus on the time management issues, but that's actually very common in young coaches. Heck I even see it in veteran coaches. It's also something that's learned with experience. Anybody who wants to can him for those mistakes in year 1 is an idiot. More importantly, I saw the best offense we've had since the early Marino years. McD and his schemes was a big part of that. That's something special that should be developed. On defense, I don't believe Boyer is terrible as a DC, but I also don't think he's a guy you could go forward with given the talent allocations on the roster. IMO a switch to a DC who uses more cover 6, cover 8 zone based schemes should be the direction.